Esperanza Spalding's receipt of the 2011 Grammy Award for
Best New Artist was both historic and controversial not only because it
marked the first time that a jazz artist was accorded that particular
honor but because it signaled possibilities for new directions and a
"re-contextualization" of the jazz aesthetic with an emphasis on vocal
performance, radical genre hybridity, multilingualism, intertextuality,
the marketability of women artists, and the return of socially relevant
discourse in American music. There is no doubt that the National Academy
of Recording Arts and Sciences sought to honor Spalding's seventy weeks
on the Billboard charts for her eponymous 2008 sophomore effort; the
rise of her fourth album, Radio Music Society (Heads Up), to
top five on the 2012 Billboard Jazz charts; her mainstream crossover
appeal that resulted in an advertising spot with Banana Republic; and
her 2009 performance for President Barack Obama's Nobel Peace Prize
ceremony. The Academy may have also stumbled across the birth of a new
jazz idiom that would reject traditional gender hierarchies and
corporate-influenced genre boundaries in its embrace of an open and
ever-expansive music that could once again be truly relevant to a broad
diversity of audiences. The irony is that this would happen in the midst
of jazz music's ever-declining share of commercial music CD sales and
internet downloads as well as apocalyptic debates within the jazz world
about the future survivability of the idiom. Many of the jazz
cognoscenti would completely miss the moment. It turns out that while
jazz critics and scholars have been waiting for the second coming of
John Coltrane and Miles Davis, a powerful resurgence of discursively
relevant, popular jazz has been happening at the intersection of women's
performance, hybridity, multilingualism, and intertextuality. It is
precisely in this location that Esperanza Spalding and the New Jazz are
emerging.
Esperanza Spalding's critical and commercial
accomplishments beg a reconsideration of the contemporary crisis and
rumored "death" of jazz. Specifically, what role can women's jazz
performance, radical genre hybridity, multilingualism, intertextuality,
and discursive relevance serve in an aesthetic and commercial
renaissance of the jazz aesthetic? I want to build a theory from what
artist/composer and Kennedy Center Artistic Advisor Jason Moran has
called "re-contextualization" and his suggestion of the infinite
possibilities of jazz as an umbrella aesthetic for the radical
hybridization of all musical genres and the endless intertextual
relationships of music and other art forms. And, finally, I want to
foreground women's vocal jazz as a fundamental axis of
"re-contextualization," a significant broadening of the definition of
jazz music, and communication of the social/cultural relevance of the
aesthetic.
Esperanza Spalding's burgeoning career is the most
logical place to begin such an inquiry because her career is profoundly
linked to contemporary discursive formations of the cultural
hybridization of race and gender in a nation experiencing significant
demographic shifts and calling into question the assumptions of American
race, class, gender, and sexual identity politics. Her career has deep
roots in the history of socially relevant woman-centered vocal jazz and
blues music that runs through Bessie Smith, Billie Holiday, and
Cassandra Wilson to name just a few. Spalding clearly has peers at the
vanguard of "re-contextualized" jazz music including, but not limited to
Terri Lyn Carrington, The Robert Glasper Experiment, Jason Moran,
Madeleine Peyroux, and Gretchen Parlato. What sets Esperanza Spalding
apart as an avatar of a new and re-contextualized jazz music is her
ability (1) to significantly broaden the definition of jazz music and
advance it as commercially viable without sacrificing its core aesthetic
integrity and improvisational prerogatives; (2) to deconstruct gender
bias and the concomitant second class status of vocal jazz performance
within the jazz world; (3) to deconstruct performatively the conflation
of aesthetics and racial authenticity and advance an understanding of
the radically hybrid origins and future of the jazz aesthetic; and (4)
to re-contextualize seemingly disparate musical genres to suggest new
communities of musicians and listeners that affirmatively transcend
traditional social/cultural boundaries.
The Death of Jazz?
A great deal of jazz commentary since the 1990s has
focused on the future survivability of jazz music in America.
Pronouncements of the "death" of jazz typically focus on quantitative
commercial sales data and subjective aesthetic evaluations. These
arguments are always linked, and critics are divided on the question of
whether jazz has become a high art inaccessible to mass audiences or
whether artists have merely ceased innovating the art form.
Terry Teachout's 2009 Wall Street Journal
article "Can Jazz Be Saved?" presents an exemplary case for the
commercial "death" of jazz in light of jazz's exodus from popular to
high art. His commercial sales data is drawn from the 2009 National
Endowment for the Arts Survey of Public Participation in the Arts.
Teachout cites the NEA's findings on declining CD sales and audiences
for live performances as well as the rising median age of jazz
concertgoers. Teachout asks, "What does this tell us? I suspect it
means, among other things, that the average American now sees jazz as a
form of high art. Nor should this come as a surprise to anyone, since
most of the jazz musicians that I know feel pretty much the same way.
They regard themselves as artists, not entertainers, masters of a
musical language that is comparable in seriousness to classical music -
and just as off-putting to pop-loving listeners who have no more use for
Wynton Marsalis than they do for Felix Mendelssohn."
Written in the late 1990s, Eric Nisenson's Blue: The Murder of Jazz
is probably the most obvious example of critics and scholars who locate
the "death" of jazz in subjective aesthetic judgments of its waning
creativity and innovation: "the clearest indication that jazz is fading
as an art form is the increasing diminution of genuine creative
vitality" (13). Nisenson specifically makes the case for the "murder" of
jazz, critiquing the notion of a contemporary renaissance based on the
ascendancy of the Lincoln Center or the emergence of a large crop of
new, young musicians (13). He critiques both Lincoln Center and the new
generation of jazz performers as "revivalists" who are "so transfixed by
jazz's magnificent past that they are as paralyzed as deer standing on a
highway staring into the headlights. They seem unable to move ahead,
unwilling to create music made out of the grist of their own time and
place" (18-19).
Certainly much can be made of the impact of jazz
"revivalists" and the impact of the jazz "classicism" of the Lincoln
Center. However, neither Teachout nor Nisenson nor others of their ilk
appear to recognize the ongoing commercial success of vocal jazz
performance, the vocal performances of women singers in particular, and
the ever-transformative ability of jazz music to incorporate and
influence an infinitely diverse host of other aesthetic forms and genres
including, but not limited to, folk, rock, hip-hop, electronica, pop,
and world music.
The persistent failure to recognize vocal performance as
simultaneously commercially and aesthetically potent is principally
rooted in a fundamental de-valuation of vocal performers as something
other than true musicians and innovators, a phenomena shared by jazz and
the European classical world. It is secondarily linked to the explicit
and implicit sexism of jazz scholarship and criticism that has long
relegated the extraordinary women who have dominated vocal jazz to
second-class status beneath largely male instrumental innovators. The
failure to comprehend genre hybridity and ever-expanding definitions of
jazz music is complicated by the presence of jazz purists and
conservationists who have long failed to recognize the kind of radical
hybridity and experimentation that has always been happening at the
margins. It may be said that Teachout and Nisenson et al. fall prey to
the very same "high art" bias - with a smattering of sexism - that they
so stridently critique.
Vocal Jazz, Gender, and Commercialism
In a 2010 article for The Root.com, music critic Jozen
Cummings attempts to counter the dire prophecies of Teachout and
Nisenson, proclaiming, "Jazz is never going to die. Too many hip-hop
producers sample jazz music for that to happen." From the outset,
Cummings announces that he is speaking to hybridity, intertextuality,
and contemporary manifestations of jazz music's ability to fuse with
other musical genres.
Acknowledging jazz's ever-declining market share,
Cummings places the burden of a commercial jazz revival on the shoulders
of Esperanza Spalding: "But if there were any hope at all for a jazz
artist to buck the downward trend, the responsibility would lie on the
shoulders of Esperanza Spalding - the brilliant, exciting
bassist-vocalist whose eponymous debut album sold a respectable 72,000
copies when it was released in May 2008, according to Nielsen Soundscan,
making it the 17th best-selling jazz album of the year. No small feat,
when one considers the jazz genre's seemingly endless discography of
legends like Miles Davis and John Coltrane. (She also sold 42,000
digital singles that same year)."
Cummings suggestive conflation of women's vocal
performance and genre hybridity is well-supported by recent commercial
music sales data. Among the top ten jazz albums on the Billboard Charts
during the spring of 2012, five were produced by vocalists Esperanza
Spalding, Tony Bennett, Paul McCartney, Frank Sinatra, and Kat Edmonson.
Significantly, two vocalists on the jazz charts were women and by 2
June 2012, vocalist Melody Gardot's The Absence EP (Verve)
debuted at the eighth spot on the jazz album chart. It should also be
noted that from spring of 2011 to January 2012, Brazilian vocalist
Gretchen Parlato's The Lost and Found (ObliqSound) spent some
seventy-two weeks on the Billboard Charts, topping at number four. Three
of the top ten jazz albums were produced by instrumentalists who
integrated vocal performances within their compositions including Chris
Botti's Impressions (Columbia), the Robert Glasper Experiment's Black Radio (Blue Note), and Arturo Sandoval's Dear Diz
(Concord). Interestingly, two of the Billboard top ten jazz albums
integrated hip-hop aesthetics: Esperanza Spalding and the Robert Glasper
Experiment. Robert Glasper's first full-length album featured a host of
vocal performers including women vocalists Erykah Badu, Lalah Hathaway,
Ledisi, Chrisette Michele, and Meshell Ndegeocello.
What recent Billboard charts appear to suggest is the
responsiveness of modern audiences to jazz music that integrates the
structures (i.e. melody, harmony, rhythm) and texts (i.e. lyrics) of
other musical art forms and genres. Additionally, jazz audiences appear
to prefer the integration of non-jazz structures and texts when
presented by women performers and, in many cases, women vocalists.
Esperanza Spalding's use of Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese,
Spanish-speaking vocalists featured by Arturo Sandoval, Maria
Farantouri's Greek and Byzantine folk songs, or the Brazilian Portuguese
lyrics sung by Gretchen Parlato further suggest that jazz audiences may
not be averse to the integration of multilingualism and that they may
well be able to tolerate the confluence of all of these factors in one
composition.
Perhaps in light of the Billboard success of vocal
performance and woman-centered performance, Esperanza Spalding is
beginning to appear on the critics and audience rankings for the
establishment publications Jazz Journal, DownBeat, and JazzTimes. In 2010, Chamber Music Society (Heads Up) was ranked at the thirty-fourth position on the JazzTimes Top 40 list. The DownBeat 2011 Reader's Poll honored Spalding as best new jazz artist, mirroring the Grammy Awards; however, the DownBeat Critic's Poll only recognized Spalding as a Rising Star on electric bass. Spalding did not appear on the 2011 Jazz Journal new
issues critics list, but she was the cover story for their January 2011
edition, an accomplishment that is certainly extraordinary in light of Jazz Journal's overwhelming preference for male artists as cover stories.
JazzTimes and DownBeat readers and
critics are also beginning to come around on the broader categories of
vocal performance, women's vocal performance, multilingualism, and
contemporary genre hybridity. On the 2011 JazzTimes Top 40 new releases, the Charles Lloyd/Maria Farantouri
Athens Concert (ECM) English-Greek collaboration appears at number six; Terri Lynn Carrington's Mosaic Project
(Concord) featuring all-women jazz performers and vocalists Esperanza
Spalding, Dianne Reeves, Dee Dee Bridgewater, Sheila E., Nona Hendryx,
Cassandra Wilson, and Geri Allen appears at number fourteen; Gretchen
Parlato's The Lost and Found (ObliqSound) appears at sixteen; Kurt Elling's The Gate (Concord) is nineteen; Elling's collaboration with Theo Bleckmann and the Claudia Quintet on What Is Beautiful (Cuneiform) is ranked twenty-one. Jazz Journal did recognize Kurt Elling's recording on its 2011 critics list of new issues.
The overall relatively "lower" rankings and infrequent
regard for vocal performance, women's vocal performance, and genre
hybridity are indicative of the role that JazzTimes, Jazz Journal, and DownBeat
have played as lagging indicators of the critical importance of these
movements for the future survivability of jazz music. The critics who
write for these establishment publications have not been at the vanguard
predicting the role of such artists as Spalding. However, the mere
recognition of such magical recordings as the Charles Lloyd/Maria
Farantouri collaboration, in which jazz music is integrated with
Byzantine sacred and folk music as well as the sounds of the lyra
(pear-shaped fiddle) and the laouto (Eastern lute), is indicative of an
awakening amongst the establishment to the infinite possibilities of
extending the very definition of the genre.
In fact, Esperanza Spalding's particular achievement as
an innovator and avatar of a new jazz has been held in dubious regard by
the jazz establishment and reflects the notion that much of the jazz
establishment is in a transitional moment. In a JazzTimes
article in May 2012, Giovanni Russonello wrestles with the perceived
"contradiction" of audience expectations of Spalding as jazz "savior"
and her personal, artistic interest in hybridity and broader avenues of
musical expression: "Slowly but surely, the jazz world is realizing that
she may have already moved past its boundaries. At the very least, she
is ignoring them."
Russonello specifically cites Spalding's 2010 release Chamber Music Society
(Heads Up) as a turning point, confusing her attempts at expanding the
very definition of jazz with rejection of the jazz idiom: "On Chamber,
Spalding's pastiche was suddenly inundated with new colors, mostly muted
grays and browns thrown onto a canvas of classical undertones. No
longer did Spalding the jazz musician seem interested in expanding
genre; she was trying to ignore it." Dramatically likening Spalding to a
wandering lover, Russonello further mischaracterizes Spalding's
expansion of the genre as rejection: "All of this ought to be telling
jazz's diehards something - what they already knew but didn't really
want to admit. It's a little like silently realizing that, sure, your
girlfriend still loves you, but she's been across the room dancing with
somebody else all night. The reason Spalding took home the Best New
Artist Grammy is the same reason why she can't possibly be what most
purists want her to: She won it because she has novelty - a crucial
figure in the pop music equation - and that much-maligned asset known as
crossover appeal. That's a term that really means jazz accounts for, at
best, a slim majority of an artist's influences."
However, much to his credit, Russonello acknowledges that
Spalding's work promises a bright future for jazz, in spite of the
dubious regard in which she is held by the establishment: "With the
arrival of her two most recent albums, 2010's Chamber Music Society and the newly released Radio Music Society,
both on Heads Up, it's become clear that trying to understand Esperanza
Spalding as 'this' type of musician who makes 'that' type of music is
going to be futile. We ought to approach her from the other direction:
Every bit of work she offers is just another light she's turned on for
us, illuminating one more room where she's been laying her plans and
charting her way."
Re-Contextualization, Hybridity, and Broadening the
Definition of Jazz
On 30 April 2012, Jazz pianist and composer Jason Moran -
the recently installed Artistic Advisor for the Kennedy Center - spoke
at length with NPR's Neil Conant about the future survivability and
continued relevance of jazz music. As stated above, Moran, who succeeds
Billy Taylor as only the second Artistic Advisor at the Kennedy Center,
posited a theory of "re-contextualization" in which jazz music would
present itself differently in order to survive. His argument is
suggestive of a sophisticated interplay of musical "texts," "forms," and
the manipulation of "language" and "dialect." For example, Moran spoke
eloquently of his own performative "re-contextualization" of Afrika
Bambaataa's "Planet Rock" (hip hop form, text, and "language") and his
collaboration with Meshell Ndegeocello to transform the music of Fats
Waller into contemporary dance music (the text of stride piano meets the
texts of soul, funk, rock, and dance).
I want to extrapolate from Moran's brief comments and
build a theory of "re-contextualization" that can be used to measure the
significance of Esperanza Spalding's work and many of the new voices
responsible for a re-birth of contemporary jazz. For me,
"re-contextualization" refers to radical genre hybridity,
intertextuality, multilingualism, and a return to the connection between
music and socially relevant discourse. I use the spirit of Roland
Barthes post-structuralist interpretation of "intertextuality" to
explain the interpretation of meaning of a particular text (i.e. lyrics)
by a listener in relation to other text. "Radical hybridity" refers to
meaningful and evocative juxtapositions of musical genres and speaks to
the compositional form in which lyrical texts are presented. In many
cases, meaning may be rendered through an intertextual interpretation of
the juxtaposition of lyrical texts against musical forms or even
against language, where "genre" or "language" and "dialect" become
another "text." I have chosen to use the term "radical" in this context
to emphasize multiple and unexpected genre juxtapositions that fall
outside of the norm of expected and now "traditional" pairings (e.g.
Brazilian jazz, jazz-rock fusion, etc.). My attention to "discursive
relevance" is a call to music that matters and either initiates or
substantiates real-world discursive practices.
What Moran is specifically referring to is the need for a
significant broadening of the definition of jazz. He is suggesting that
in fact jazz music is such a fundamental aspect of music generally
speaking - American and global music - that jazz is everything and can
encompass anything. His own experimentation with hip-hop and soul vocal
performance speaks to this "re-contextualization" of the music. Indeed,
Esperanza Spalding clearly concurs with this view of the jazz
aesthetic. In an interview on Riz Khan's One on One, she says:
"These days it seems that jazz is the word that is open enough that it
can encompass almost what anybody does."
Jozen Cummings echoes Jason Moran's notions of hybridity
and "re-contextualization," suggesting that Spalding's ability to remain
aesthetically as well as commercially relevant to diverse audiences of
listeners rests on her ability to play with a host of different musical
genres. Cummings writes: "Spalding sees her surging popularity
differently. Just because her audience is probably more familiar with
Motown than Monk doesn't mean she will cater to their ears. As an
example, she points out 'I Adore You,' a song from her album Esperanza.
'I remember having discussions, and [some would say,] "It's too much
scatting, it's too jazzy." And now all the time, people say it's their
little kids' favorite song,' Spalding says. 'And there are no words.
Parts of it are complex, but aspects of it speak to their kids, too.'
And for Spalding, therein lies the challenge: to speak to audiences of
all ages through a variety of genres. 'Obviously, the audience that
shows up to [Austria's] Vienna Opera House is going to be different than
the audience that shows up to [New York's] Joe's Pub,' says Spalding,
who has played at both venues. 'I guess I'm really blessed that it's
very diverse, and it will be a blessing as long as I stay relevant.'"
There is no better example of intertextuality and radically hybrid genre juxtaposition than Spalding's third CD release Chamber Music Society
(Heads Up). Ostensibly a nod to the early years of her classical
training and the foundations of classical music as a more communal style
of acoustic playing without horns and with limited orchestration, Chamber Music Society
incorporates an adroit hybridization of jazz, soul, funk, world music,
and western classical concert music. Her composition, "Little Fly," is
indicative of the kind of radical time-space intertextuality that
Spalding embraces. The intertextuality of "Little Fly" integrates the
fundamental existential questions posed by the eighteenth century poetry
of William Blake within the musical context of soulful vocals; a
European chamber music composition for acoustic bass, cello, violin, and
viola; and a brief improvised jazz bass solo outro. Spalding wraps a
multi-textured lyrical meditation on time and the balance between life
and death within a hybrid musical composition that itself draws
attention to the meditation on time and space. Musically, she blends
contemporary NuSoul lyricism with a pre-Baroque medieval musical form
and jazz improvisational approaches that have defined the American
experience since the dawn of the twentieth century. Here, Blake's
meditation on life meets Spalding's journey through musical time and
genre.
The specific musical pairing of chamber music and jazz
improvisation suggests significant linkages between the contrapuntal
prerogatives of the former and the polytonal and poly-rhythmic group
improvisations of the New Orleans and free jazz, all of which are
strongly suggestive of Spalding's emphasis on community. Taken as a
whole, Spalding's hybridity and intertextuality deftly integrates
community within Blake's poetic rendering of the delicate balance
between life and death, suggesting that community operates as a fulcrum
in that delicate balance and perhaps even the broader community between
human and animal life/nature offered by Blake. Furthermore, her use of
hybridity and intertextuality challenges both time and space, suggesting
not only possibilities for present community formation but also the
blending and re-contextualization of historical traditions.
Spalding has spoken about chamber music as a form most
suitable for emphasizing community, underscoring the implications of her
music in formal interview settings and providing further discursive
cues for listeners. In an EPK for the release of Chamber Music Society,
Spalding comments, "Chamber music is music for people. It is often
described as music for friends." Here, Spalding insists again that the
music is about community and implies that intertextuality and the hybrid
interplay of genres potentially draws together new forms of community,
bringing musicians who may heretofore have never considered performing
together an opportunity to do so in a meaningful musical conversation
across time and space.
Socially Relevant Discourse
Esperanza Spalding's formal aesthetic hybridity,
multilingualism, and intertextuality encompasses profound social
meaning. Her brand of "re-contextualized" jazz conveys a performative
deconstruction of aesthetic racial authenticity rooted in her own
multiethnic heritage that resonates with contemporary post-racialist
aspirations. Her radical hybridity, intertextuality, and multilingualism
offer a sophisticated and playful pastiche of time and place that
challenges aesthetic racial ownership and monolithic constructions of
both race and culture. In many respects, Spalding's compositional
interplay of diverse musical traditions deconstructs difference as
problematic and suggests a kind of harmonious and democratic racial
polyphony. This focus on harmonious polyphony implies Spalding's own
prerogative for creating community through a "re-contextualized" jazz
aesthetic. Spalding simultaneously de-centers musical genres from
specific racial or national affiliation and re-locates them within
expressions of broader communities of sound.
In her interview with Riz Khan's One on One,
Spalding responds to a question about her own African-American, Latino,
Welsh, and American Indian ancestry as well as her ability to sing in
English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Her characterization of her own
ancestry and youthful cultural experiences informs us of her very
genuine and perhaps "natural" appreciation of cultural hybridity and
"re-contextualizatio." She states: "Those cultures have influenced me
in this way. Growing up I didn't identify with any of those
specifically. So I think the way that that has influenced my art is
really in kind of being cultural identity neutral, which is good and
bad. It's helpful, as we all know, to be a part of a defined identity,
defined way of expressing yourself, interacting with your ancestors and
with your story, how to behave in the culture. Without a very strong
foundation you end up looking for examples from other cultures of how to
act, how to speak, how to sing, how to play, everything. And that can
be good and bad. I think in the music it's really good."
Spalding's "Black Gold" duet with Algebra Blessett - a contemporary R&B singer with gospel roots - from the 2011 release Radio Music Society (Heads
Up) - is illustrative of the ways in which Spalding infuses hybrid
aesthetic juxtapositions and intertextuality with social meaning and
relevance. Spalding's composition is an affirmative and upbeat fusion of
jazz, NuSoul, and gospel music and serves as an affirmation and
encouragement to young black men, insisting on the critical importance
of an Afrocentric reading of history:
Hold your head as high as you can
High enough to see who you are, little man
Life sometimes is cold and cruel
Baby no one else will tell you so remember that
You are Black Gold, Black Gold
You are Black Gold
Now maybe no one else has ever told you so
But you're golden, baby
Black Gold with a diamond soul
Think of all the strength you have in you
From the blood you carry within you
Ancient men, powerful men
Builders of civilization
They'll be folks hell-bent on putting you down
Don't get burned
'Cause not necessarily everyone will know your worth
The official video for "Black Gold" features an
African-American father picking up his two sons from elementary school
and, after learning the substance of their history lessons, informing
them about the greatness of African civilization. At home, the father
shows his sons his African history scrapbook, entitled "Black Gold," and
highlights the achievements of such diverse figures as Sundiata, Miriam
Makeba, Salif Keita, Nelson Mandela, Desmond Tutu, and Fela Kuti. The
video concludes with the father taking his sons to hear Spalding and
Blessett as they sing to these two young men from an urban block party
stage. The video has an urban community feeling of racial, gender,
sexual identity, and age diversity as people gather around the stage
wearing t-shirts bearing the faces of many of the different figures in
African history in the father's "Black Gold" history book. Against the
video backdrop of an urban and largely African-American community block
party performance, Spalding's lyrics suggest that a re-contextualized
black nationalism and Afrocentricity can be used as a contemporary
racial affirmation of African-American youth that may serve as a
foundation for building healthy communities. The message is clear:
self-love through historical awareness is the first step toward
enfranchisement in a democratic society.
Although "Black Gold" reasserts discourses of black
nationalism and Afrocentricity of the 1960s, '70s, and '80s, the video
importantly fails to visually or aurally represent the specific
historical contexts that gave birth to these ideas, and, in so doing, it
purposely decontextualizes and inverts these ideas and re-presents them
for a new and broadly inclusive politics of self-love. The video's
particular presentation of many of the core figures of Afrocentric
discourse and its assertion of the popular Afrocentric phrase "Africa
was inhabited by Kings and Queens" by the father is unmistakable, but
its re-presentation of these figures in the father's well-worn scrapbook
- a classic example of how relationships between texts affect
interpretation and meaning - re-locates them in an undefined future and
re-contextualizes them for the contemporary audience of two school age
African-American boys in an urban American environment; these images are
now used to inform these young men that they are beautiful. That the
community they participate in appears inviting further suggests that
black enfranchisement through a re-contextualized black nationalism is
fundamental to broader issues of inclusive coalition building and racial
harmony.
Spalding's "Black Gold" composition not only broadens the
definition of jazz music but it also engages socially relevant
discursive practices. She not only "re-contextualizes" the music, but
the message as well. Spalding's lyrical manipulation of Afrocentrism
alludes to specific expressions of the burgeoning "golden years" of
hip-hop in a pre-gangster rap era marked by such artists as Afrika
Bambaataa, KRS-One, and, later, A Tribe Called Quest, and Public Enemy.
Spalding draws the listener's attention to hip-hop's long lost ability
to engage affirmative messaging and its initial and profound connection
to community. She also deconstructs the hyper-masculinity of hip-hop and
prescriptively suggests the significant role of women in the
development and positive encouragement of young black men. Most
importantly, Spalding's embrace of genre hybridity challenges the
conflation of racial authenticity and aesthetics in hip-hop, suggesting
that music in general and hip-hop in particular have always been the
product of racial encounters and diaspora and cannot legitimately
support claims to racial authenticity.
Nowhere was the discursive relevance of Esperanza
Spalding's music put to a greater test than her performance at the Nobel
Peace Prize Award Dinner for President Barack Obama. Spalding performed
"Espera" from her eponymous sophomore album. In a relatively
straightforward jazz trio (piano, bass, drums) and with simply a tease
of multilingualism in the title, Spalding unloaded a deeply moving plea
for peace, consistent with her aesthetic and social/cultural message of
polyphony before the newly installed American President:
People I almost gave up holding on
Watching us give into our fears
I almost believe
Almost believe
All the world is helpless sorrow
No hope for a bright tomorrow
But I'm not sure enough
To give it up...no
Now as I learn how I must work for change
I nearly cave in from the weight
I almost believe
Almost believe
All the sorrows will consume me
'Til peace among men I never can see
But I'm not sure enough to give it up
I'll keep faith
Like so many souls who won't be drowned
By evil in the world
I have faith in mankind
That we can guide our choices towards a healthy world
In time
To ease our bind
For only hard work through time
Can change men's minds,
I know if we make some small changes now
We'll heal ourselves, and that's true power
I don't expect to ever taste the fruit
My life devoted could bring forth
I almost believe
Well I do believe
The road to peace is endless
To journey with open eyes is how we'll end this
Of this I'm sure enough
I WON'T GIVE UP
I'M SURE ENOUGH
AND I WON'T GIVE UP
I'M SURE ENOUGH
AND I WON'T GIVE UP
Spalding's performance of "Espera" did far more than
merely reflect the hopeful tenor of the Nobel proceedings. Her lyrical
presentation provided a contrasting text to Obama's acceptance speech
and challenged the fundamental rationale for Obama's receipt of the
award. Spalding's "Espera" functioned as a critical intertextual mirror
in which Obama could evaluate the appropriateness and the burden of the
award. Obama was specifically cited by the Norwegian Nobel Committee
"for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and
cooperation between peoples," his promotion of nuclear
nonproliferation, and for presumably creating a "new climate" in
international relations by extending dialogue and diplomacy to the
Muslim world (Erlanger and Stolberg). But there were fundamental
contradictions surrounding Obama's receipt of the award including his
stated intention to escalate the war in Afghanistan, a war that he had
always claimed was the "correct war," and his exposition of the concept
of a "just war" in his Nobel acceptance speech.
Obama walked a rhetorical tightrope in his acceptance
speech, weighing peace as the glorious yet impossible ideal of the likes
of Gandhi and the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. against the
political and, in his view, very permanent realities of conflict and the
existence of evil in the world. Cognizant of his role as a politician,
he contrasted himself with the storied idealists of peace: "I make this
statement mindful of what Martin Luther King said in this same ceremony
years ago - 'Violence never brings permanent peace. It solves no social
problem: it merely creates new and more complicated ones.' As someone
who stands here as a direct consequence of Dr. King's life's work, I am
living testimony to the moral force of non-violence. I know there is
nothing weak - nothing passive - nothing naĂ¯ve - in the creed and lives
of Gandhi and King. But as a head of state sworn to protect and defend
my nation, I cannot be guided by their examples alone. I face the world
as it is, and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to the American
people. For make no mistake: evil does exist in the world. A non-violent
movement could not have halted Hitler's armies. Negotiations cannot
convince al Qaeda's leaders to lay down their arms. To say that force is
sometimes necessary is not a call to cynicism - it is a recognition of
history, the imperfections of man and the limits of reason."
Obama outlined a pragmatic doctrine for the use of force
and explicitly dismissed the pacifist idealism. He evoked moral and
strategic imperatives, asserted America's commitment to global security
and nuclear disarmament, prioritized human rights, and suggested a path
to honor through adherence to these principles and defined rules of
engagement. But his measured justification of war embraced contradiction
and patronized Gandhi and King as naĂ¯ve in spite of his stated regard
for their lives and work. In response to the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King
Jr.'s absolutist and indeed radical notion that injustice anywhere
threatens justice everywhere, Obama retorted, "We can acknowledge that
oppression will always be with us, and still strive for justice. We can
admit the intractability of depravation, and still strive for dignity.
We can understand that there will be war, and still strive for peace."
In her position as an artist, Esperanza Spalding's
performance of "Espera" reasserted pacifist idealism and the critical
importance of the human striving for the ideal. Spalding's use of the
phrase - "Now as I learn how I must work for change" - signified Obama's
central campaign theme and signaled her interpretive intentions. Key
phrases such as "real power"; her dubious evaluation in the phrase "I'm
not sure enough"; her lyrical recognition that change rests not in the
power of one leader but in the activities of many in the phrase "I have
faith in mankind"; and her powerful declaration that ends the song "I
won't give up" - all combine to form an evocative assessment and plea to
the Obama presidency to reassess his blanket rejection of pacifist
ideals. In context, it was an incredibly courageous counter-narrative to
Obama's measured political pragmatism. Spalding further demonstrated
the real substance of democratic free speech - often confused with the
unfettered ability to spew meaningless vitriol - as an exercise in
speaking truth to power.
Certainly, there are vastly different responsibilities in
politics and art, but Spalding's willingness to engage the political
reminds us how American art and music have served as important
social/cultural initiators and how critical the production of artistic
counter-narratives are for the healthy functioning of a pluralistic
democratic society. Through the creation of a new "re-contextualized"
jazz music that recaptures the discursive relevance and social/cultural
viability of American art, Spalding firmly locates herself within the
history and evolution of jazz music, a once profoundly relevant musical
form born of the gumbo of hybridity, intertextuality, and
multilingualism in turn of the century New Orleans, Louisiana.
Conclusions
The popularity of jazz music has always rested on its
discursive relevance to community and its ability to either suggest or
form new communities of listeners. Each evolutionary shift in the
musical form of jazz produced shifts in discursive practices, whether
from swing to bop or from bop to free jazz. And each of these
transitions had a clear, definable and singular discourse that gave
meaning to the individual notes played or sung by improvising musicians.
New Orleans jazz reflected the broad diversity of the
region, the complicated racial hierarchies of French Catholic society,
and the newfound freedom of African Americans who created this art form.
Jazz defined the new social ethos, reflected changing gender dynamics
and social mores of the Roaring Twenties, and emerged in the midst of
significant technological advancements in communications including the
development of the radio and phonograph (Nisenson 58). That jazz emerged
in the midst of significant technological developments in communication
cemented its modernity. The great swing bands of the 1930s and '40s
spoke a light and danceable language of escape for a generation
suffering under the Great Depression and seeking sources of aesthetic
energy to fight World War II. The frenetic pace of post-WWII bebop and
the contrasting relaxed feel of cool jazz simultaneously spoke to a
Cold War generation living under the ever-present threat of nuclear
annihilation, Communist witch hunts and the broad expansion of American
capitalism (Nisenson 126). The Afrocentric allusions and return to the
cross-rhythms, the call and response of free jazz spoke to the northern
and western urban manifestations of the Civil Rights Movement and were
unmistakably political.
There are many specific compositional examples of
linkages between the formal aesthetic evolution of jazz music and the
evolution of jazz's meaningful engagement and interaction with relevant
social discourse. As David Evans notes, Bessie Smith's socially
relevant 1927 recording "Back-Water Blues" about the 1926 Cumberland
River Flood in Nashville, Tennessee, reminds us of the intimate linkages
to community that the blues, the ancestral precursor of jazz, has
always had. Consider Billie Holiday's "Strange Fruit," first performed
in 1939 at the Café Society Club in New York City or Charles Mingus's
"Fables of Faubus" on the 1959 release Mingus Ah Um (Sony), an
explicitly political piece that served as a response to Arkansas
governor Orval E. Faubus, who in 1957 dispatched the National Guard to
prevent the integration of Little Rock Central High School by nine
African-American teenagers. Consider "Hiroshima: Rising From the Abyss"
by Toshiko Akiyoshi, a stunning musical portrait of the chaos and horror
of war and the lessons one must learn in its aftermath.
The improvisational engine of jazz music assures its
continued presence in American and global cultures. Improvisation is a
fundamental discourse, particularly germane to immigrant and diasporic
experiences and certainly central to the experience of enslavement of
the African-American creators and innovators of jazz music. However,
contemporary times require another substantive link between the jazz
aesthetic and relevant public discourse that might be inclusive of the
modern day realities of the welfare state, poverty, chronic
unemployment, endless war, the crisis of racialism and the promise of
post-racialism, the crisis of the nation-state and the advent of
globalism, etc.
The problem with a lot of jazz today is that, absent any
living discourse outside of the discourse of nostalgia, the individual
notes played by improvising musicians no longer carry the same broad
cultural meanings that they bore when jazz was America's popular music.
Hence, the effective "death" of jazz music as a popular cultural art
form. Much of jazz no longer informs us on broader, national and
international cultural levels, no longer provides moments of euphoria
and escape in the midst of a challenging economy or war-torn years, no
longer speaks the language of the speakeasy and the flapper, no longer
resonates the onomatopoeia of the railroads carrying migrants north and
westward from the Mississippi Delta, no longer speaks to the complicated
multiculturalism and brazen lawlessness of New Orleans, no longer
speaks to the Cold War and the nuclear age, no longer speaks to our
longing for freedom. Further, many jazz musicians no longer produce
compositions like "Alabama" or "Fables of Faubus." Jazz hasn't
necessarily "died" but in order for the music to connect with people on a
larger, national, international, popular discursive level, jazz music
must incorporate an even broader and increasingly more diverse range of
meanings around a progressive and determined movement of
"re-contextualization."
Hybridity, intertextuality, multilingualism are, in my
view, the relevant discourses of the new millenium in this an age of
globalization and rapid technological advancements in global
communication, the emergence of China and India as world economic
powers, the decline of the European economy, the re-appraisal of sexual
identity difference and gender, transnationalism, significant
demographic shifts, and the crisis of a diminishing European-American
majority. We are nearing the twilight of racial, gender, and sexual
identity bias. It is the age of the Occupy movement and the critique of
American colonialism and corporatism. We need a jazz music that speaks
to the chaos of our times and assists us as listeners with the process
of interpreting meaning and sifting through the noise.
In my view, Esperanza Spalding is speaking to
contemporary discursive formations of cultural hybridity,
intertextuality, and multilingualism that are broadly inclusive of many
of these tensions. Her work suggests that jazz improvisation is a
fundamental discursive practice that undergirds and incorporates endless
other musical forms, extra-musical texts, and languages. The new
aesthetic of Spalding's re-contextualized jazz communicates an important
and timely social message about cultural hybridity, suggesting
possibilities for alternative community formation and creative new
cultural/social alliances in a world of ever-changing alliances,
particularly as the Enlightenment legacy of race, gender, and sexual
identity wane. Furthermore, Spalding's work is suggestive of the
vanguard leadership of women in building a new future. The question of
the survivability of jazz rests in large measure on the ability of
musicians like Esperanza Spalding to continue to draw an ever-expanding
circle around this thing called "jazz," create new and previously
unheard of communities of sound, and connect their art to that which is
socially and culturally relevant.
Works Cited
Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” Image-Music-Text. New York: Hill & Wang Publishers, 1978. 142- 148.
Cummings, Jozen. “The Root Interview: Esperanza Spalding on Taking a Big Risk.” The Root 30 August 2010: http://www.theroot.com/views/root-interview-esperanza-spalding-staying-relevant
Erlanger, Steven and Sheryl Gay Stolberg “Surprise Nobel for Obama Stirs Praise and Doubts” New York Times 8 October 2009: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/10/world/10nobel.html?_r=2&
Evans, David. “Bessie Smith’s ‘Back-Water Blues’: The Story Behind the Song.” Popular Music 26.1 (2006): 97-115.
Nisenson, Eric. Blue: The Murder of Jazz. Cambridge: MA: Da Capo Press, 2000.
Obama, Barack. "Remarks by the
President at the Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize." The White House
Website 10 December 2009:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-acceptance-nobel-peace-prize
Russonello, Giovanni. "Esperanza Spalding: Star Time."JazzTimes 7 May 2012:
http://jazztimes.com/articles/29851-esperanza-spalding-star-time
Spalding, Esperanza. EPK. Chamber Music Society. Montuno Artists. Uploaded 22 July 2010: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKcTuqO8FSk
---. Interview. Riz Khan's One on One. Al Jazeera English. Uploaded 18 September 2010: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duiDsimsJLk&feature=related
Teachout, Terry. “Can Jazz Be Saved?” Wall Street Journal 9 August 2009: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574320303103850572.html