SOUND PROJECTIONS
AN ONLINE QUARTERLY MUSIC MAGAZINE
EDITOR: KOFI NATAMBU
SUMMER, 2018
VOLUME SIX NUMBER ONE
SONNY ROLLINS
Featuring the Musics and Aesthetic Visions of:
TEDDY WILSON
(July 14-20)
GEORGE WALKER
(July 21-27)
BILLY STRAYHORN
(July 28-August 3)
LEROY JENKINS
(August 4-10)
LAURYN HILL
(August 11-17)
JOHN HICKS
(August 18-24)
ANTHONY DAVIS
(August 25-31)
RON MILES
(September 1-7)
A TRIBE CALLED QUEST
(September 8-14)
NNENNA FREELON
(September 15-21)
KENNY DORHAM
(September 22-28)
FATS WALLER
(September 29-October 5)
George Walker
(b. June 27, 1922)
Walker is the first African American to win the Pulitzer Prize for Music, which he received for his work Lilacs in 1996. He is the first African American to appear as an instrumentalist with the Philadelphia Orchestra, playing Rachmoninoff’s 3rd Piano Concerto. He is the first African American to receive a doctorate from the Eastman School of Music, from which he also received an Artist Diploma in piano. His many distinguished teachers include the likes of Nadia Boulanger. He has composed over 90 works for orchestra, chamber orchestra, solo instruments, and chorus, which have been performed by most of the major orchestras around the world.
http://stringsmagazine.com/composer-george-walker/
When he published his memoirs in 2009, George Theophilus Walker chose the title Reminiscences of an American Composer and Pianist. It was at the keyboard that he first formed his musical identity, starting when he was five. Precocious musically and intellectually, Walker graduated from high school at 14 and in the yearbook announced his intention to become a concert pianist—which is precisely what he proceeded to do, in characteristic Walker fashion. With unwavering determination, he initially focused on his career as a performer.
Just two weeks after Walker’s debut at New York’s Town Hall in 1945, he appeared as the soloist in Rachmaninoff’s Third Piano Concerto with the Philadelphia Orchestra under Eugene Ormandy. He was later signed to National Concert Artists, a dominant management company at the time. All of these were first-time achievements for an African-American instrumentalist. Walker’s musicianship earned positive reviews, and he undertook an extensive European tour in 1954, during which he continued to win more acclaim.
Yet coveted performance opportunities remained frustratingly scarce. In a 1982 interview with the New York Times just before the premiere of his Cello Concerto (a New York Philharmonic commission), Walker lamented that “those successes were meaningless, because without the sustained effect of follow-up concerts my career had no momentum. And because I was black, I couldn’t get either major or minor dates.” He noted that fellow white students at Curtis “were assured of 25 to 30 concerts a season, but I was lucky if I got seven. It was like being excommunicated from society. I was unwanted.’’
http://stringsmagazine.com/composer-george-walker/
GEORGE WALKER
He occupies more than one slot in the pantheon of American music. Along with breaking through the race barrier multiple times, as a piano virtuoso and as a composer, George Walker continues to sustain a creative life in his 90s that is of a very rare order—one reminiscent of Elliott Carter and Henri Dutilleux. Just before celebrating his 95th birthday in June, Walker shares his thoughts about a richly productive life.
by Thomas May
Strings Magazine
Strings Magazine
Photography by Frank Schramm
When he published his memoirs in 2009, George Theophilus Walker chose the title Reminiscences of an American Composer and Pianist. It was at the keyboard that he first formed his musical identity, starting when he was five. Precocious musically and intellectually, Walker graduated from high school at 14 and in the yearbook announced his intention to become a concert pianist—which is precisely what he proceeded to do, in characteristic Walker fashion. With unwavering determination, he initially focused on his career as a performer.
“I come from a family of pianists,”
Walker points out during a recent conversation from his home in
Montclair, New Jersey. Born in 1922, he grew up in an arts-loving
household in Washington, DC. His father, a Jamaican immigrant, had
arrived in the United States with just a few dollars but became a
respected physician who taught himself piano for enjoyment; his highly
musical mother watched over George’s first lessons. Frances
Walker-Slocum, his sister (now 93), also became a professional pianist
and a professor of the instrument at the Oberlin Conservatory, from
which George graduated at the age of 18, having concentrated on piano
and organ.
When Walker began studying composition in
graduate school at the Curtis Institute, it wasn’t so much an end in
itself as it was a secondary activity. “I had so much energy that I
wanted to do something else after spending hours practicing at the
keyboard!” Walker recalls. He also believed learning the secrets of
composing would help hone his interpretive skills performing the classic
repertoire.
Just two weeks after Walker’s debut at New York’s Town Hall in 1945, he appeared as the soloist in Rachmaninoff’s Third Piano Concerto with the Philadelphia Orchestra under Eugene Ormandy. He was later signed to National Concert Artists, a dominant management company at the time. All of these were first-time achievements for an African-American instrumentalist. Walker’s musicianship earned positive reviews, and he undertook an extensive European tour in 1954, during which he continued to win more acclaim.
Yet coveted performance opportunities remained frustratingly scarce. In a 1982 interview with the New York Times just before the premiere of his Cello Concerto (a New York Philharmonic commission), Walker lamented that “those successes were meaningless, because without the sustained effect of follow-up concerts my career had no momentum. And because I was black, I couldn’t get either major or minor dates.” He noted that fellow white students at Curtis “were assured of 25 to 30 concerts a season, but I was lucky if I got seven. It was like being excommunicated from society. I was unwanted.’’
Eventually, despairing that his musical
life was at a dead end, Walker found himself compelled to divert his
extraordinary gifts from performance into the realm of teaching. And,
little by little, into writing his own music. In the process, Walker
gradually added a varied and challenging catalogue of work that has made
him a genuine American cultural treasure. Now, at age 95, he
additionally belongs to the rarefied ranks of composers who remain
creatively active at an advanced age.
Though he won the Pulitzer Prize for Music in 1996 for Lilacs for Voice and Orchestra—a
magnificent, densely textured setting of the poetry of Walt
Whitman—much of Walker’s output remains unjustly neglected. A great
place to start exploring his work is his array of compositions for
strings. “I never played a string instrument, but somehow strings have
always fascinated me,” remarks Walker. “I can’t explain why that is.”
That perspective may explain something of the originality of this composer’s extensive writing for strings. Among these works are solo, chamber, and orchestral scores (the concertante pieces have been commissioned by such first-class ensembles as the New York Philharmonic and the Cleveland Orchestra): Bleu for unaccompanied violin, two quartets, a pair of violin-piano sonatas, violin and cello concertos, Poeme for violin and orchestra, Dialogus for cello and orchestra, a viola sonata, and a cello sonata. “I always wanted to write something for each of the string instruments,” says Walker, though the double bass remains a challenge he has yet to cross off his bucket list: “I find the instrument is too easily covered by the orchestra.”
That perspective may explain something of the originality of this composer’s extensive writing for strings. Among these works are solo, chamber, and orchestral scores (the concertante pieces have been commissioned by such first-class ensembles as the New York Philharmonic and the Cleveland Orchestra): Bleu for unaccompanied violin, two quartets, a pair of violin-piano sonatas, violin and cello concertos, Poeme for violin and orchestra, Dialogus for cello and orchestra, a viola sonata, and a cello sonata. “I always wanted to write something for each of the string instruments,” says Walker, though the double bass remains a challenge he has yet to cross off his bucket list: “I find the instrument is too easily covered by the orchestra.”
“In playing his Cello Sonata, you’re
engulfed in a state of beauty and episodic turmoil,” observes Seth
Parker Woods, a maverick American cellist and performance artist who is a
rising star of the young generation. “One of the things I love is that
its amazing melodic lines fit perfectly in the hand, as if they were
molded all along for a cellist. It’s a brilliant work that I really
would love to see more and more younger and older cellists performing.
George Walker’s music is of monumental status and importance.” Woods is
also a member of the UK-based Chineke! Orchestra, which is on the BBC
Proms roster this summer with a program that will include Lyric for Strings, Walker’s most frequently performed work.
“In playing his Cello Sonata, you’re engulfed in a state of beauty and episodic turmoil.”—Seth Parker Woods, cellist
In fact, Lyric originates from a string quartet.
Walker wrote it as a very young man, in 1946—when he still identified
above all as a pianist, and before he had begun to remake himself as a
composer. It began as the brief, profoundly moving second movement
(Molto Adagio) of his String Quartet No. 1. Walker made this into an
independent piece for string orchestra, à la Adagio for Strings by
Samuel Barber, who had also been taught at the Curtis Institute by the
violinist-composer Rosario Scalero, one of Walker’s most formative
mentors.
As a student of piano and composition at
Curtis, Walker took lessons from Rudolf Serkin, violist William
Primrose, and cellist Gregor Piatigorsky. Scalero in particular
imprinted on him a work ethic and a sense of rigor and discipline that
have guided him ever since. “Composers today don’t have teachers who
believe in the same way in the importance of studying counterpoint and
the elements of skill. But I think you need to absorb and understand
what other composers have done in the past before you can set about
changing and creating something new. What will represent your own voice
will come out.” He emphasizes his advice to young composers: “Listen to
lots of music.” He’s an unabashed advocated of the “canon,” of “pieces
that have achieved a certain status such that you don’t have to question
their quality, so the task becomes to understand what it is that makes
up that quality.”
As his graduation piece, Walker wrote a
sonata for violin and piano he decided to disown—even though the
hard-to-please Scalero had liked it. Then, soon after his Town Hall
debut that year (in 1945), “for some reason, in my early 20s, I was
determined to write a string quartet. I had just written the first
movement and was starting the second when I learned that my grandmother
had died,” Walker recalls. The string orchestra version of the Adagio,
dedicated to her memory, received its premiere via radio broadcast,
under the title Lament.
Family connections have played a crucial role in Walker’s creative work throughout his career. He dedicated his 1991 Poeme—the
revised version of an earlier violin concerto that is “by no means a
tranquil piece”—to his mother, and his Violin Concerto (2008) is a
late-period masterpiece whose impetus was a father’s love and admiration
for his son. With his former wife, the music historian Helen
Walker-Hill (1936–2013), Walker had two sons who both became artists.
Ian Walker is a playwright, actor, and director based in San Francisco
(he authored Dutch, about the famous art forger Han van
Meegeren); older brother Gregory Walker followed more directly in his
father’s footsteps and pursued a career as a musician, but chose the
violin in lieu of the family tradition of piano.
“Gregory really had no aptitude for the
piano, but then he discovered the violin and became fascinated,” Walker
remembers. After studying with Yuval Yaron, a pupil of Heifetz, Gregory
Walker went on to become concertmaster of the Boulder Philharmonic
Orchestra. He teaches at the University of Colorado at Boulder (where
Walker was a visiting professor in 1968) and has also become involved in
the realm of electronic music and video art as well. Walker composed
the Violin Concerto “in secret” to present as a gift, hoping to give his
son’s career a major boost.
A loan from the Rachel Barton Pine
Foundation enabled Gregory Walker to unveil his father’s concerto
playing the 1718 Strad on which Zoltán Székely gave the first
performance of Bartók’s Second Violin Concerto in 1939. After the
premiere with the Philadelphia Orchestra led by Neemi Järvi in 2009—64
years after his father had broken through the race barrier to play
Rachmaninoff’s Third with the same ensemble—Gregory took it on tour to
Europe and recorded it (with Ian Hobson conducting the Sinfonia
Varsovia).
In 2010 Gregory Walker recounted the story of his living with the Violin Concerto for Strings,
where he pithily but aptly summed up the character of his father’s
music as well known “for its craftsmanship, intensity, and complexity.
It’s not easy listening, but dad believes if the music is perfect, it
will speak for itself.” Along with providing a musical gift for his son,
George Walker wanted to create a work “that would be totally different
from the standard repertoire, using the orchestra in a different way.”
He mentions such features as a full-on fugue in the final movement’s
exposition.
Walker wrote a sort of addendum for his son in 2011 with the solo violin piece Bleu—extremely
difficult music in a complex, painstakingly crafted idiom. “I thought
it would be nice to write an encore for Gregory to use in recitals,” the
composer explains with a sly note in his voice (fully aware of how
technically fiendish the piece is). Last year violinist and conductor
William Harvey completed a project in which he performed for one week in
each of the 50 states in the United States; he played Bleu in all of his concerts.
Throughout his lengthy career, Walker has
never been content to rest on laurels. He is a mindful, consummate
craftsman who believes music has something serious and ennobling to
convey. His works in recent years do not follow the pattern of radical
simplicity and paring down associated with some composers’ “late-period”
style. Indeed, there has been an intensifying complexity of the
harmonic language and polyphony. In his latest large-scale project, the
still-unheard Sinfonia No. 5, Walker addresses the 2015 Charleston
church massacre by incorporating a brief, poetic text he wrote, which is
shared by five narrators. He also weaves in musical references to a
spiritual, a hymn, and Americana.
Walker here has devised a technique of
combining musical fragments that he likens to the situation of the Tower
of Babel. “No one can understand each other, no matter how hard they
try. Musically, each presentation of the quoted material preserves its
distinctiveness, but this is all entwined in a rigorous recurrence of
the principal idea. I’ve never done that before, where the principal
idea recurs in various guises so consistently.”
“This late-in-life drive in his music is
really quite remarkable,” says Pierre Ruhe, the Alabama Symphony’s
director of artistic administration and former classical critic of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
“You hear this enormous capacity and need to communicate.” Ruhe
believes that Walker’s music will make its breakthrough to wider
recognition “when a major conductor champions his music and does so
consistently.”
In the meantime, Walker continues to
follow where his musical instinct takes him. “More and more, I realize
the power of music—the power of the interval, of rhythm, of being exact
in what I put down as what I meant to hear.”
https://www.allmusic.com/artist/george-walker-mn0001191248/biography
Although he started out as a highly promising concert pianist in a grand style (some of his most prominent concerts featured concertos by Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninov, and Brahms), George Walker was writing substantial music from his mid-twenties. By the time he was 40, he had solidly established himself as a flexible, fully contemporary composer and it is on his large catalog of works produced from the early '50s to about 1990 that his reputation will rest.
He studied piano through childhood, going on to obtain degrees in performance from Oberlin (bachelor of music, 1941) and the Eastman School of Music (doctor of musical arts, 1957). He also studied at the Curtis Institute and with Nadia Boulanger at the American Conservatory, Fontainbleau. His teachers included Rudolf Serkin; Robert Casadesus; Mieczyslaw Horszowski; and in chamber music, Gregor Piatigorsky and William Primrose.
Walker seemed destined for a fine career at the keyboard. He won acclaim with his Town Hall debut in New York in 1945 and was the first black musician to play there. Also that year, he was the first African American instrumentalist to win the Philadelphia Orchestra auditions, which led to a performance of Rachmaninov's Piano Concerto No. 3 with that orchestra and Eugene Ormandy. He toured America and Europe as a soloist through the 1950s. During this period, his presence as a black man on the classical stage surely held curiosity value, but it was through his work as a pianist and subsequently as a composer that the African American presence in classical music began to seem unexceptional. From the mid-'50s, his teaching career included short stints at various colleges and long-term affiliations with Smith College (1961 - 1968) and Rutgers University (1969 - 1992, including two years chairing the music department).
"I believe that music is above race," Walker once said, and his own music does not strongly position him as an African American composer. His mature style grafts serialism onto neo-Classical forms, binding the two with complex rhythms, Hindemithian counterpoint, strong timbral contrasts, and occasional evocations of black folk music through reference to blues, spirituals, and jazz. He won the Pulitzer Prize (the first living black composer to do so) in 1996 for Lilacs, a work for soprano or tenor and orchestra, commissioned by the Boston Symphony.
Although he was an adept orchestrator, his acknowledged masterpiece is for solo piano: the 1956 Sonata No. 2, written as his doctoral dissertation for Eastman. It's a short work that displays Walker's fascination with classical forms (variations on a ground bass, sonatina), while insinuating a jazzy syncopation into the scherzo. It's not an entirely characteristic work, though, in its fairly conservative harmony. The same can be said of his most widely heard orchestral piece, the Lyric for Strings, a 1946 transcription of the second movement of his String Quartet No. 1. Two better examples of Walker's mature voice date from 1975: Piano Sonata No. 3 and Music for Brass (Sacred and Profane). Both are angular works reflecting Walker's fascination with sonority. His more populist but still dissonant mode is well-represented by 1990's Folk Songs for Orchestra.
https://www.allmusic.com/artist/george-walker-mn0001191248/biography
George Walker
(b. June 27, 1922)
Artist Biography by James Reel
Although he started out as a highly promising concert pianist in a grand style (some of his most prominent concerts featured concertos by Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninov, and Brahms), George Walker was writing substantial music from his mid-twenties. By the time he was 40, he had solidly established himself as a flexible, fully contemporary composer and it is on his large catalog of works produced from the early '50s to about 1990 that his reputation will rest.
He studied piano through childhood, going on to obtain degrees in performance from Oberlin (bachelor of music, 1941) and the Eastman School of Music (doctor of musical arts, 1957). He also studied at the Curtis Institute and with Nadia Boulanger at the American Conservatory, Fontainbleau. His teachers included Rudolf Serkin; Robert Casadesus; Mieczyslaw Horszowski; and in chamber music, Gregor Piatigorsky and William Primrose.
Walker seemed destined for a fine career at the keyboard. He won acclaim with his Town Hall debut in New York in 1945 and was the first black musician to play there. Also that year, he was the first African American instrumentalist to win the Philadelphia Orchestra auditions, which led to a performance of Rachmaninov's Piano Concerto No. 3 with that orchestra and Eugene Ormandy. He toured America and Europe as a soloist through the 1950s. During this period, his presence as a black man on the classical stage surely held curiosity value, but it was through his work as a pianist and subsequently as a composer that the African American presence in classical music began to seem unexceptional. From the mid-'50s, his teaching career included short stints at various colleges and long-term affiliations with Smith College (1961 - 1968) and Rutgers University (1969 - 1992, including two years chairing the music department).
"I believe that music is above race," Walker once said, and his own music does not strongly position him as an African American composer. His mature style grafts serialism onto neo-Classical forms, binding the two with complex rhythms, Hindemithian counterpoint, strong timbral contrasts, and occasional evocations of black folk music through reference to blues, spirituals, and jazz. He won the Pulitzer Prize (the first living black composer to do so) in 1996 for Lilacs, a work for soprano or tenor and orchestra, commissioned by the Boston Symphony.
Although he was an adept orchestrator, his acknowledged masterpiece is for solo piano: the 1956 Sonata No. 2, written as his doctoral dissertation for Eastman. It's a short work that displays Walker's fascination with classical forms (variations on a ground bass, sonatina), while insinuating a jazzy syncopation into the scherzo. It's not an entirely characteristic work, though, in its fairly conservative harmony. The same can be said of his most widely heard orchestral piece, the Lyric for Strings, a 1946 transcription of the second movement of his String Quartet No. 1. Two better examples of Walker's mature voice date from 1975: Piano Sonata No. 3 and Music for Brass (Sacred and Profane). Both are angular works reflecting Walker's fascination with sonority. His more populist but still dissonant mode is well-represented by 1990's Folk Songs for Orchestra.
https://www.theguardian.com/music/tomserviceblog/2015/aug/27/george-walker-african-american-composer-pulitzer-prize
George Walker: the great American composer you've never heard of
The first African American to win the Pulitzer for music is
celebrated for overcoming cultural prejudice, but his work is so good
this should only be a sideshow to the main event of his compositions
http://georgetwalker.com/recent_publications.html
Solo Piano:
Vocal:
contents
Home
http://georgetwalker.com/reviews.html
Orchestra:
Address for Orchestra (1959)
An Eastman Overture (1983)
Folk Songs for Orchestra (1990)
Foils for Orchestra (Hommage a Saint George)
(2005)
Hoopla (A Touch of Glee) (2005)
Lyric for Strings (1946)
Pageant and Proclamation (1997)
Sinfonia No. 1 (1984)
Sinfonia No. 2 (1990)
Sinfonia No. 3 (2003)
Sinfonia No. 4 (Strands) (2012)
contents
Concertos:
Concerto for Piano and Orchestra (1975)
Concerto for Trombone and Orchestra (1957)
Dialogus for Cello and Orchestra (1976)
Poeme for Violin and Chamber Orchestra (1991)
Violin Concerto (2009)
Chamber Orchestra:
Tangents (1999)
Orpheus (1994)
Folk Songs for Orchestra (1990)
Serenata for Chamber Orchestra (1983)
Chamber Music: Abu (2004)
Poeme for Soprano and Chamber Ensemble (1987)
Sonata for Violin and Piano, no. 1 (1958)
Cello Sonata(1957)
Violin and Piano Sonata no. 2 (1979)
String Quartet no. 2 (1968)
Piano Music:
Prelude and Caprice (1945, 1941)
Guido's Hand (1986)
Sonata for Piano, no. 1 (1953)
Sonata for Piano, no. 2 (1956)
Sonata for Piano, no. 4 (1984)
Sonata for Two Pianos (1975)
Vocal Music:
Cantata for Soprano, Tenor, Organ, Boys Choir and Chamber Orchestra (1982)
Lilacs for Voice and Orchestra (1995):
Songs
Home
http://www.bruceduffie.com/walker.html
Composer / Pianist George
Walker
A conversation with Bruce Duffie
GW: Thank you
very much.
http://georgetwalker.com/articles.html
The Audiophile Voice:
Barnes and Noble:
Piano and Keyboard Keyboard Magazine:
contents
Positive Feedback:
Scarecrow Press:
Home
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/music/2015/08/20/d6e9e6c2-3beb-11e5-9c2d-ed991d848c48_story.html?utm_term=.4e0a661d1215
Photographer Frank Schramm had just moved to Montclair, N.J., when he heard one of Walker’s pieces playing on the local public radio station. He sent Walker an e-mail, not having any idea where he lived. Turns out, they were in the same town. Walker dropped Schramm a tape. The photographer began taking pictures. That was 2004. Schramm, who has continued photographing the composer, provided the Washington Post with these images.
When they play it right
https://nmbx.newmusicusa.org/george-walker-concise-and-precise/
FJO: Did you destroy the piece, or did you save it?
FJO: There’s a comment you made about writing music in your autobiography that I’d like to talk more about with you. You wrote that writing music is not so much about inspiration as it is about the force of will.
FJO: There was an evolution happening in your music that had already started before your studies with her; it almost seems like those studies were a detour and that your music ultimately went in a direction that had nothing to do with her. Your music in the 1950s was getting more and more chromatic.
“Chromaticism comes about from my interest in expanding the harmonic vocabulary.”
GW: It’s frustrating because there’s no way even to irritate them. It’s all over. People like to think you’re collaborating with the conductor. You’re not collaborating. He’s standing up there. And you go up and you say, “Please can you ask them to play it louder.” “Yeah, O.K. Play it louder.” But when I come back up and say, “I didn’t hear it.” “Well, I heard it.” Well, what can you do? The session is over. Then you have these compromises where they don’t want to hire someone to play the one chord in the harpsichord, because they have someone who’s playing the piano. But he can’t get over to the harpsichord in time.
George Walker has helped blaze a trail for African-American
classical composers. His music has been performed by many of this
country's top orchestras — he's got more than 80 commissions and a
Pulitzer Prize to his name. Yet only now — at the age of 87 — has George
Walker written a work for his son. Violinist Gregory Walker didn't even
know about it until the finished score showed up in the mail.
"Didn't know about it until it was too late," the younger Walker deadpans. "He maintained the element of surprise. And I think, along with that, you're able to maintain an element of artistic control. And he's an expert at that."
George Walker doesn't entirely deny the jab about "artistic control," but the composer says he knew his son was up to the task.
"It's not a long work. But it's a very intense, difficult and challenging work for both the soloists, and the orchestra," says George Walker.
A Long Career Marked By Challenges And Firsts
George Walker has been writing intense, sometimes difficult music for more than 50 years. Walker was born in Washington, D.C. He was the first black pianist to give a recital at Town Hall in New York City in 1945. Walker studied composition with two of the best: Nadia Boulanger in Paris and Rosario Scalero at the Curtis Institute of Music in Philadelphia. But success as a composer didn't come easily.
"I had to find my own way," says George Walker. "A way of doing something that was different; something that I would be satisfied with."
Walker's patience was rewarded in 1996, when he became the first black composer to win the Pulitzer Prize for Music, for the piece Lilacs.
Even Gregory Walker admits it took him a while to understand his father's music.
"I just was weaned with his particular approach to the art from time when I didn't understand what he was going for, when it was just as abstract to me as it can be for other lay listeners," says the younger musician. "But in time — with different kinds of exposure — I've really learned to embrace and hopefully communicate what he has in mind."
Though none were written with him in mind, Gregory Walker has made a specialty out of playing his father's previous compositions — they've even recorded together.
The Premiere That Almost Wasn't
The younger Walker is also the concertmaster of the Boulder Philharmonic Orchestra in Colorado. When George Walker sat down to write his new Violin Concerto, he knew he wanted his son to give the world premiere.
"I wanted him to have the opportunity of performing a work on a larger scale, for a larger audience than he ever done before," says the composer. "I had hoped that I could persuade at least one orchestra to allow him to play it."
It almost didn't happen. The Philadelphia Orchestra was in talks to perform the concerto at Carnegie Hall earlier this year — with a different violinist. George Walker said no. But his son Gregory admits he's not the kind of superstar soloist whose name alone can sell tickets.
"We know that there are other people who, if they set their minds to it, can play this music," Gregory Walker says. "That's one of my main aspirations: that I can at least hold the torch long enough, without singeing myself, to pass it on to a great player who can make a vehicle of it, and really deliver it to the wider audience it deserves."
His father jumps in. "I'd like to correct that," says George Walker. "The fact is that in insisting that he play the concerto, I was aware that he could do justice to the work. Don't for a minute think that there's anybody who's going to play it better than he. Don't for a minute think that."
What George and Gregory Walker both hope is that their collaboration will bring attention to one piece and two careers — that deserve more of it.
https://bestthingsny.com/event/95th-year-celebration-with-pianist-george-walker-2018-04-02-rochester-ny.html
The Eastman School of Music is proud to celebrate the 95th birthday year of composer and pianist George Theophilus Walker in a special alumnus recital in Hatch Recital Hall at Eastman, followed by a champagne toast and reception in Wolk Atrium for the audience. The recital, comprised of the complete (5) piano sonatas of George Walker, will be performed by Albanian pianist Redi Llupa, with opening remarks by Jamal Rossi, the Joan and Martin Messinger Dean at Eastman.
The first African American to graduate with a Doctorate from Eastman in 1956, and the first African-American composer to win a Pulitzer Prize (for Lilacs for Voice and Orchestra) in 1996, George Walker’s Eastman accolades also include an Alumni Achievement Award in 1975 and the Rochester Distinguished Scholar Medal in 1996.
“It was fortuitous for me to read an article in the New York Times in 1954 about the DMA Degree created by Dr. Howard Hanson at Eastman when I was teaching at Dillard University, a small black private college in New Orleans,” Walker recalls. “I applied for admission into the graduate program and was extremely happy to receive a fellowship. During that time Dr. Hanson proposed that DMA candidates could select a project that was not a dissertation for the DMA Degree. I chose to compose my Piano Sonata No. 2. This work has become one of the most performed American piano sonatas.”
That piano sonata, along with four others, will make up the program for Walker’s 95th birthday celebration at Eastman. “Having all five of my piano sonatas performed by Redi Llupa in a celebration of my music is very special. They represent additions to the repertoire of piano literature that should be known.” Walker adds on a personal note, “My son, Gregory, will participate in the celebration by playing my Sonata for Violin and Piano No. 1.”
Walker’s career and legacy is brimming with accomplishments and successes. He blazed the trail for many African-American musicians by being; the first black instrumentalist to appear with the Philadelphia Orchestra, the first black instrumentalist to be signed by a major management, the National Concert Artists; the first black tenured faculty member at Smith College; first recipient of the Minority Chair established by the University of Delaware; and the first composer to receive the Whitney award. George Walker has composed over 90 works for orchestra, chamber orchestra, piano, strings, voice, organ, clarinet, guitar, brass, woodwinds, and chorus.
“George Walker is one of the most prolific and accomplished American composers of the last century. In addition to having been awarded the coveted Pulitzer Prize, he has been honored by some of our nation’s leading cultural organizations including the American Academy of Arts and Letters, and the American Classical Music Hall of Fame,” shares Dean Jamal Rossi. “We are very proud to consider Dr. Walker as one of Eastman’s most distinguished alumni, and I am privileged to know him as a friend.”
Walker’s works have been performed by virtually every major orchestra in the United States, and by many in England and other countries. His awards include the Harvey Gaul Prize, MacDowell Colony, Yaddo and Bennington Composer Conference Fellowships, two Guggenheim Fellowships, two Rockefeller Fellowships, a Fromm Foundation commission, two Koussevitsky Awards, an American Academy of Arts and Letters Award, a Mary Flagler Cary Charitable Trust Award, the Mason Gross Memorial Award, numerous grants from the Research Councils of Smith College, The University of Colorado, Rutgers University, the National Endowment for the Arts, and the New Jersey Council on the Arts. He has received two Alumni Awards from the Eastman School of Music, the University Medal from the University of Rochester (1996), honorary doctorate degrees from Lafayette College (1982), Oberlin College (1983), Montclair State University, Bloomfield College, Curtis Institute of Music (1997) and Spelman College (2001).
It is fitting that Walker’s 95th birthday musical celebration will be at Eastman, as one of the featured pieces is one he wrote while attending as a student. “I am most grateful for the continuity of my connection with Eastman, a wonderful institution,” Walker reflects. “The support that Eastman has given me since I graduated in 1956 has been truly amazing.”
The George T. Walker 95th Birthday Year Celebration recital is free and open to the public.
THE MUSIC OF GEORGE WALKER : AN EXTENSIVE VIDEO OVERVIEW, A CROSS SECTION OF RECORDINGS, MUSICAL ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY, PLUS VARIOUS INTERVIEWS GEORGE WALKER:
Selected Works
- Concerto for Violin and Orchestra (2007)
- Foils (Hommage a Saint George) for Orchestra (2006)
- Hoopla ( A Touch of Glee) for Orchestra (2006)
- Sinfonia No. 3 for Orchestra (2002)
- Sinfonia No. 4 for Orchestra (2013)
- Icarus In Orbit (2002)
- Pageant and Proclamation for Orchestra (1997)
Chamber Orchestra:
- Abu for Narrator and Chamber Ensemble (2003)
- Tangents for Chamber Orchestra (1999)
Chamber Music:
- Bleu for Solo Violin (2011)
- Da Camera(2008)
- Wind Set for Woodwind Quintet (1999)
- Modus for Flute, Oboe, English Horn, Two Guitars, Mandolin, Violin and Cello (1998)
Organ:
- Two Pieces for Organ: Prayer and Improvisation on St. Theodulph
- Spires for Organ (1998)
Solo Piano:
- Piano Sonata no. 5 (2003)
Vocal:
- And Wilt Thou Leave Me Thus for Baritone and Piano (2002)
- Take, O Take Those Lips Away for Baritone and Piano (2002)
contents
Home
http://georgetwalker.com/reviews.html
George Walker
Reviews
"An underheard American Master"
(Fanfare Magazine, July/August 1997)
(Fanfare Magazine, July/August 1997)
Contents:
Orchestra:
Address for Orchestra (1959)
- "A rewarding composition to hear. " (Audiophile Audition)
- "A Master handler of brass and wind sections." (Allmusic)
- "A major piece of great energy and thrust whose three movements are culminated by a moving Passacaglia" (San Francisco Chronicle)
- "A powerful Passacaglia" (N. Y. Times)
- "The product of a craftsman whose compositional horizons are international, this is an evocation filled with strength and urgent communication- the metrical patterns constantly fluctuating and creating a rhythmic impression of linear propulsiveness, the sonorities strange and experimental, the harmonic language highly chromatic." (Baltimore Sun)
An Eastman Overture (1983)
- "A tight-knit, brilliantly orchestrated and dramatic work" (Washington Post)
Folk Songs for Orchestra (1990)
- "Folk Songs for Orchestra....these moving transformations of simple melodic elements-- encased like gems within Walker's sensitive, original, meditative settings--into far-ranging statements invite repeat listening." (Amazon.com)
Foils for Orchestra (Hommage a Saint George)
(2005)
- "Rambunctious and stormy throughout. It is a work of deep-seated conflict with its churning themes and emphatic accents." (San Francisco Chronicle)
Hoopla (A Touch of Glee) (2005)
- "Energetic paean . . . strength and will combined with vibrancy and more than a bit of boldness." (Las Vegas Review-Journal)
Lyric for Strings (1946)
-
"Deserves to be as popular as the string elegies by Grieg, Faure and Elgar". (Classical New Jersey)
-
"Intense, haunting, lyrical beauty" (News Journal, Mansfield, OH)
- "Hushed beauty and passionate intensity" (American Record Guide)
- "A gorgeous find" (Cincinnati Enquirer)
- "A finely crafted and deeply felt piece" (Philadelphia Inquirer)
- "Intensely moving and beautiful" (High Fidelity)
- "It reminds one of Barber's Adagio for Strings, only less sentimental and ultimately, more profound" (Baltimore Evening Sun)
- "A Masterpiece!" (Fanfare Magazine)
- "One of the most beautiful pieces ever written" (News Journal, Wilmington, Delaware)
- "A Gem." (Baltimore Sun)
- "As a piece of gentle art . . . it has few peers." (Philadelphia Inquirer)
Pageant and Proclamation (1997)
- "A statement of tremendous power" (Classical New Jersey)
- "Colorfully scored for large orchestra, it moves from fanfare to serenity and ends with a noble brass phrase from "We Shall Overcome". (New York Times)
- "A powerfully affirmative tone poem" (Records International)
Sinfonia No. 1 (1984)
- "Incandescent Colors" (Audiophile Audition)
Sinfonia No. 2 (1990)
- "A work filled with dramatic momentum and vivid orchestrational details" (New Music Box)
Sinfonia No. 3 (2003)
- "Rugged expressiveness... muscular, thrusting gestures... a dark prism of colors ...a clangorous finale" (Detroit Free Press)
Sinfonia No. 4 (Strands) (2012)
- "Arching melodic lines mirroring the graceful columned arches above the performers" (Santa Cruz Sentinel)
- "A characteristically eloquent piece of 14 minutes...packed with gripping ideas and fragrant sound colors" (Memeteria)
contents
Concertos:
Concerto for Piano and Orchestra (1975)
- "The blockbuster of the evening, full of poetry and pyrotechnics" (Washington Star)
- "A mastery of serial effects with the more traditional values of dramatic statement, effective instrumental color, attractive melodic motion" (Washington Post)
Concerto for Trombone and Orchestra (1957)
- "A bold virtuoso vehicle of considerable melodic and rhythmic power that speaks with a deeply personal voice" (High Fidelity)
- "The finest work of its kind for trombone" (The Music Connection)
Dialogus for Cello and Orchestra (1976)
- "A technically brilliant showcase for a virtuoso cellist" (Cleveland Plain Dealer)
- "It's effervescent concentration and spindle-woven melodic content are a joy to hear" (Audiophile Audition)
Poeme for Violin and Chamber Orchestra (1991)
- "An elegantly crafted piece by a distinguished composer" (St. Paul Pioneer Press)
- "Dramatically expressive, lyrically intense". (Record International Catalogue)
Violin Concerto (2009)
- "An evocative works by an under-appreciated American master" (American Record Guide)
- "Destined to achieve a legendary status" (Naxos)
- "It's dissonant and colorful, and shifts suddenly between drama and beauty, tension and motion. Gregory Walker played the concerto with precision and rapturous immediacy. This concerto is an evocative work from an underappreciated American master. " (American Record Guide)
- "A treasure trove... thoroughly engaging on first listen and even more rewarding in subsequent hearings. " (New Music Box)
Chamber Orchestra:
Tangents (1999)
- "A work of originality and power" (Records International Catalogue)
- "Powerful, weighty stuff." (Music and Vision)
Orpheus (1994)
- "vividly colored (especially dramatic use of the brass) .. filled with jagged flashes of emotion". (Record International Catalogue)
Folk Songs for Orchestra (1990)
- "A tone-poem-like transformation of simple melodic elements into an expressively far-ranging statement" (Washington Post)
Serenata for Chamber Orchestra (1983)
- "A work of challenging sonorities in three subtly contrasted movements... a strong spirit commemorated with dignity, distance, and power" (Detroit Monitor)
Chamber Music: Abu (2004)
-
"Powerful...wondrously luminous" (Philadelphia Inquirer)
Poeme for Soprano and Chamber Ensemble (1987)
- "A masterpiece of musical blend . . . a devastating work, deserving of greater attention. " (Schenectady Gazette)
Sonata for Violin and Piano, no. 1 (1958)
- "Powerful authenticity and dramatic expression...truly great music." (Classical New Jersey)
- "It's astonishing to this listener that Walker's Violin Sonata No. 1 has yet to become a staple for recitalists... This is beautiful, deeply moving music, straight from the heart, and its appeal to the most traditional of audiences is virtually guaranteed" (Star-Ledger, Newark)
Cello Sonata(1957)
- "A revelation, showing the composer's command of architectural and expressive elements". (The Gramophone)
Violin and Piano Sonata no. 2 (1979)
- "Walker's Violin Sonata is a knockout". (Tucson Citizen)
String Quartet no. 2 (1968)
- "The writing is delicate, clear-textured and fluid, sensitive to the need for dramatic phrases as contrast and highlight. For all its transparency, the music has admirable momentum, fostered less by strong rhythms than by the constant variation in instrumental color" (New York Times)
Piano Music:
Prelude and Caprice (1945, 1941)
- "Prelude and Caprice....Superb craftsmanship" (Classics Today)
Guido's Hand (1986)
- "A remarkably eloquent piece" (Star-Ledger, Newark)
Sonata for Piano, no. 1 (1953)
- "Bold and compelling, with arresting harmonies". (Seattle Times)
- "A Major work... comparable to Barber's Sonata" (Fanfare Magazine)
- "In a word, masterly" (New York Times)
Sonata for Piano, no. 2 (1956)
- "Powerful, idiomatic piano writing" (Buffalo News)
- "An acknowledged masterpiece" (Barnes and Noble. com)
- "A tragic, haunting score" (Cleveland Plain Dealer)
Sonata for Piano, no. 4 (1984)
- "The Piano Sonata is a stunning, spacious work". (American Record Guide)
- "A distinctive work of American modernism- complex, yet immediately appealing, built, for the most part, on the contrast between stark proclamations and more lyrical passages, leading to a rousing toccata" (New York Times)
Sonata for Two Pianos (1975)
- "This terse sonata was notable for its inventive fantasy and magical piano writing... Here is a most effective addition to the piano repertory which should be heard again and often. Terrific piece!" (San Francisco Chronicle)
- "This composition is bristling with ideas, motoric energy, sophisticated craftsmanship and, in the adagio, incandescent beauty" (The Jewish Week)
Vocal Music:
Cantata for Soprano, Tenor, Organ, Boys Choir and Chamber Orchestra (1982)
- "This is a haunting, inventive piece... thought-provoking yet accessible" (Fanfare Magazine)
Lilacs for Voice and Orchestra (1995):
- "Tersely eloquent" (New Yorker)
-
"Melodies soar above the orchestra like the star and bird symbols in the text" (Detroit Free Press)
- "A poignant and dramatic work with a strongly lyrical vocal line and strikingly original orchestration." (Records International Catalogue)
- "A dense, dark work that penetrates deeply into the soul of Whitman's response to the assassination of a great leader" (Atlanta Constitution)
- "There is wonderful music in this cycle, which is profoundly responsive to the images of the text- you can hear the sway of lilies in the rhythm, smell their fragrance in the harmony" (Boston Globe)
- "A style of great emotional espressivity...The masterful text-setting is accompanied by imaginative, evocative orchestral writing". (Barnes and Noble.com)
- "A work of great surface beauty and immediacy of appeal. The vocal line soars and spirals in melismas of ardent grief; the music captures the sway and fragrance of lilacs as well as the freedom of a bird's flight". (Boston Globe)
- "Masterpiece". (The Audiophile Voice)
- "Lilacs revels in orchestral imagery…poignant brooding and a quietly glittering exultation". (Los Angeles Times)
- "A powerful and poignant re-interpretation of the liturgical meaning of the ancient Latin text" (Baltimore Evening Sun)
- "A grand work"(All Music)
Songs
- "Walker is at his finest. Each one is a gem". (American Record Guide)
- "Walker's way with Emily Dickinson is distinctly personal and powerful" (American Record Guide)
- "The songs are as outstanding as they are varied" (Fanfare Magazine)
- "Intriguing, sometimes daring melodies" (Houston Chronicle)
Home
http://www.bruceduffie.com/walker.html
A conversation with Bruce Duffie
One of the saddest days of my life was when WNIB was sold and
changed
format. For 45 years, it had been an all-classical station, and
for
just over 25 of those years it was my home. My entire career was
wrapped up in "Classical 97," and it fell to me to pull the plug.
For more details and photos, please read this
article which I wrote for City Talk magazine about it
a month later.
So what piece of music would have the honor and distinction of
bringing
this #1 classical station to a close? Amazingly, I had a few
weeks
to ponder the situation. Suggestions poured in from the big,
obvious,
triumphant bombast to the saddest melancholy to the strangely
weird.
Fortunately, I had the presence of mind to keep the selection an
absolute
secret from everyone - callers, advertisers, even the management of the
station. No one, not even my girlfriend who was with me in the
control
room [photo], knew in
advance exactly how I would bring the place in for a
landing.
I wanted something special, reflective, tender, strong, and
positive
to end. Rather than an announcement, I made my spoken farewell first
and
then my chosen musical work: Lyric for Strings by George
Walker.
The calls and e-mails which I received after that were bittersweet, but
they all said the same thing - that I had spoken eloquently, and had
chosen
the absolutely perfect piece to end.
Purely coincidentally, about 5 weeks later the Chicago Symphony
had
scheduled this same work as part of their subscription concerts, and
the
MusicNOW series included a chamber work of Walker's. He came back
to Chicago for these performances, and it was great to see him again
after
many years. He related to me that he'd been awakened early that
fateful
Monday morning by calls telling him that his piece had ended WNIB, and
he said he knew instinctively that it must have been my idea because I
had presented his music regularly in Chicago for so long.
I originally contacted George Walker in the mid-80s,
and because
a trip to Chicago was not on his calendar, we did the interview over
the
telephone. Several years later, he finally did come, and we met
briefly
during his crowded schedule. We kept in touch as his career
blossomed
and praise kept coming his way. Eventually, as we all know, he
was
awarded the Pulitzer Prize, so his stature and reputation are now
absolute.
What you are about to read is that conversation from February
of
1987. Of course, Walker is
one
who will always stand by his beliefs and would never alter his outlook
because of prominence, but these thoughts and ideas are, perhaps, more
pure and untouched by wide-spread fame and recognition.
Here is that conversation:
Bruce Duffie:
You've been teaching musical
composition
for quite a number of years?
George Walker: It
hasn't been just musical
composition.
In fact, that's been a very limited part of my teaching. Over the
years, my teaching has really centered around advanced theory courses,
and since I've been at Rutgers, a number of other courses in music
history,
romantic music, 20th century music and orchestration and even
conducting.
I did teach composition for a few years at the Peabody Institute of
Johns
Hopkins University. That was the only time in which I had a class
of students rather than the occasional student taking 'special
studies,'
though the lessons were individual. There was never a great deal
of interest in composition or students sufficiently advanced who wanted
to continue in that particular area as opposed to music education or
piano.
I've taught piano ever since I started, though not in recent years,
except
for coaching students or young artists who were performing my music.
BD: I'm always
curious, especially from a composer who has
made a reputation from composing, to find out if musical composition is
something that can be taught, or must it be innate from each individual?
GW: I have a very
strong feeling that just about
everything
can be taught. I remember reading Ned Rorem's thought that
musical
composition cannot be taught, but my attitude is simply that you can
provide
guidelines, instruction, and exercises for any aspect of musical
endeavor.
[See my Interview with Ned Rorem.]
That goes for conducting, orchestration, and certainly for
composition.
This is not to say that you can, necessarily, be predictably successful
in your efforts as you would in a theory course or even in
orchestration.
It's a matter of each person having to learn to make certain
decisions.
This is what I find to be one of the most important aspects of
composition
which one likes to link with creativity. Trying to make decisions
about what you want to use, how you want to use it, how long you want
to
use it. I think a teacher teaching composition has a tremendous
advantage.
When a student presents something to him, he's not personally involved
in having made those decisions. He is at some distance from
whatever
is shown to him. I also feel that because composition is really a
revelation of one's personal taste and personal choice, it becomes
difficult
to criticize or to correct. While I think it's essential if one
really
has confidence in one's own taste, I like to tell students, "The
ego is really involved. The ego is what determines, in part,
one's
sense of taste." So one has to be extremely tactful in dealing
with
composition students because it comes down to a simple matter of
hurting
their feelings. [Laughter]
BD: Where is the
balance, then, between technique and
inspiration?
GW: I really
don't like the word 'inspiration.' I
like
very much what Nadia Boulanger said because I always felt that this was
the essence of what people call inspiration - finding. One finds
something.
BD: So it's
really discovery?
GW: It is
discovery. It's not something that
descends
like a mantle from above or something that one senses through smell or
taste. It is a matter of encountering something that provides the
genesis to motivate the direction in which you want to go.
* *
*
* *
BD: When you're
teaching music history, do you
encourage
the students to write pieces on their own as well as just learning
about
pieces which have been written by others?
GW: I do that in
my advanced theory course, using the
technique
of following models. In other words, setting up parameters for
the
student. I feel very strongly that students need the kind of
guidance
where they must work within certain boundaries in terms of form. The
idea
is to follow a style which I don't teach but do imply. I haven't
had a lot of students who are advanced, and those who are, in the sense
that they have tried advanced techniques, often lack basic techniques
of
harmony and counterpoint, which still provide the foundation that most
composers don't have today. Therefore, the music of the past is
something
that we must understand, be able to dissect and analyze, and even
duplicate
in part so we can better understand what is good taste, what is the
essence
of a well-constructed work.
BD: By 'good
taste,' do you mean on the part of the
composer
or the public.....
GW: Good taste on
the part of the composer. The
public
we can't do anything about. They swallow what's given to them or
they regurgitate it.
BD: No middle
ground?
GW: Well, the
middle ground is always a person who says,
"That's
interesting," or "That's nice." [Laughter]
GW:
In one sense I don't expect anything because I know they're at a
terrible
disadvantage which consists of certain obvious factors that are
extremely
important. They don't know how long the piece is going to be -
even
if they read the program notes, which the critics don't seem to
do!
They don't know what style the piece is going to be unless they have
some
experience with the composer over a number of works, and it might not
follow
what they do know of a composer's work. The only way to overcome
that disadvantage is to have a performance that is scrupulously
well-prepared
and which attempts to represent the details of the piece, not just an
overall
kind of impression of it. The only thing one can hope is that the
audience isn't going to reject the piece before they start to hear it,
or even to stop listening after the piece has begun.
BD: Is this a
problem that gotten better or worse in the
last
15-25 years - the idea of an audience not wanting to hear something new?
GW: I don't
really know whether one can say because we
read
reports of premieres of 19th or even 18th century composers. The
idea of rejecting something, perhaps not from the point of view of the
audience, but from the point of view of the critic, is something that
is
very frequent. Aside from a few outstanding examples of the
audience
creating an uproar at the Rite of Spring, there haven't been
too
many documented examples of audience rejection. We know about
critical
rejection and we know about composers rejecting other composers.
In the 20th century we have such a diversity where the music is not
conforming
to a style of a particular period that the audience is going to be
discriminating
in both the best and worse sense. There's just so much to choose
from and because of that, there's a certain amount that can be disposed
of and regarded with an amount of dislike.
BD: Do you feel
it's a good thing to have so many
divergent
styles available today?
GW: It's
inevitable with the passage of musical
time.
The one lamentable thing is what I consider the state of musical
pollution
that exists. We can't escape from music in stores or even when
we're
walking in the street or taking the bus. That's the kind of thing
which is most distressing to me.
BD: Would it be
especially distressing to you to be in an
elevator and hear a snippet from one of your own works?
GW: I would be a
little embarrassed because I would be the
only one who would know it, probably.
BD: Do you think
that classical concerts should try to
attract
the kinds of numbers that the popular concerts get?
GW: I feel very
strongly that what is known as Concert
Music
is music for the elite. I remember trying to explain one obvious
difference between popular music or rock music and classical
music:
you have to sit still when you listen to classical music. This is
what one expects, so it becomes a physical state for reception.
One
has to make an effort to receive what is coming and to try to determine
what one is hearing. The greater part of the public isn't
interested
in doing that. They want to respond immediately to stimuli that
are
unquestionably strong and which require bodily movement. It's not
that one can't experience a similar sensation when one hears a Strauss
waltz, but the aspect of popular music infiltrating what is known as
classical
music, which is really extremely pronounced in certain types of
composition,
is still not what one necessarily associates with music like symphonies
or large choral pieces or cello sonatas.
BD: Should we try
to eliminate the great polarity between
the two?
GW: Well, of
course the reasonable thing simply is to try
to get the larger public interested in the medium that is really
essentially
for the elite. I say elite not because I want to use the word,
but
simply because of the fact that it does represent a choice which we
can't
understand, we can't comprehend. It's not to say that a person
who's
brought up as a middle-class person is going to be part of the elite or
a person who's family can be multi-millionaire is going to have any
more
understanding or any more desire. But there is something very
special
and very particular that grabs ahold of a certain type of person, and
that
person can be working in a car wash. I drove up to a car wash and
before I turned my radio off some Strauss waltz was on and this man
said
to me, "That's my kind of music. I don't like that boom, boom,
boom,
boom."
BD: So then
you're really talking about a state of
mind
that can be an individual thing that transcends monetary or class
distinction?
GW: No, it's a
temperament, I think. It's a
temperament
that transcends class or monetary distinctions. A predilection
that,
in a sense, we can't really always explain. You could find a
violinist
whose family ran a grocery store, but the father loved to play the
violin
at 9 or 10 o'clock at night and his wife used to sit and listen and
maybe
she would sing. That's, again, doesn't relate to the economic
level.
* *
*
* *
BD: Let me
change the subject just a little
bit.
Are you basically pleased with the performances that you have heard of
your works?
GW:
Some performances, yes. Some I've been less pleased with.
[Laughter]
I had 2 premieres just last week and they were both very good to
excellent.
I had another piece done the same week that was a good performance.
BD:
Do you get involved with
the performance of the
work and make lots of notes and suggestions, or do you just sit back
and
let the performers find what they can in your music?
GW: I hold
myself open for possibility of attending
rehearsals. In the majority of instances I'm usually never asked
to sit in on a rehearsal and so I find that I just have to take
whatever
comes. Overall I've had good results. There have been some
disappointing performances and some inexcusable performances, but
overall
the results have been good. Now and again, I get a really
excellent
performance, but that's quite rare.
BD: Has there
ever been an instance where performers
have discovered things in your music that you didn't even know were
there?
GW: Not
really. Occasionally someone would
say,
"This sounds a little like Mahler." It's usually a reference to
another
composer, and I don't really think that I've been surprised. I've
been more surprised by the way the music has been distorted than the
fact
that they've discovered something that would help the performance.
BD: What about
the recordings?
GW: There is a
certain unevenness there, even in my
own performances. I'm very much interested in the sonic quality
of
recordings. One of my earliest recordings hasn't been bettered,
but
the sound is mediocre, and the engineer was really poor, I feel.
The performance is good, however.
BD: Are you the
ideal interpreter of your works?
GW: I think I
know better what I want from the music than
anybody. I want to re-do some of the things I've already
recorded.
[NOTE: In recent years, a number of
new CDs of Walker's performances
and
compositions have appeared on the Albany label, and he is quite pleased
with them. Also, his Pulitzer-Prize work, Lilacs, is on the
Summit label.]
BD: With the
proliferation of recordings today, do you
feel
it has done anything to affect either the audiences or the performers
of
new music?
GW: Recordings
have made music available, even though the
proliferation the same music becomes very confusing. With 12 or
15
different recordings of the Tchaikovsky 6th Symphony, it's very
difficult to choose. It really doesn't make any difference if a
reviewer
says this recording is three minutes shorter than that recording.
In the case of new music, which represents a very, very small
percentage
of what's done, as long as it's available in the catalogue, it then
becomes
useful. I feel quite strongly that we - the public and the
musicians
- have been manipulated by the elimination of the LP from the
catalogue.
Regardless of the merits or demerits of the CD, both of which could be
argued very sensibly, the analogue catalogue represents a tremendous
body
of reference works. Even though many of them will be presented on
CD, the absence of the Schwann Catalogue means you don't really know
the
existence of these recordings. It's rather pathetic to go into a
store and try to find something. On the other hand, with the CD
you
have better sound sometimes. I'm particularly pleased with
Frederick
Moyer's recording of the 4th Sonata. He commissioned the
work.
BD: I assume you
get many commissions. Do you also
have
time to write things just because you want to get them out?
GW: Not
really. I only have time to meet the
deadlines
of each commission.
BD: Then how do
you decide which commissions you'll accept
and which you'll decline?
GW: They've been
coming in at a fairly steady rate,
occasionally
overlapping. But I have yet to be in a position to turn down a
commission
for lack of time to fulfill it.
BD: Is there a
circumstance where you might feel you don't
want to do a particular kind of piece?
GW: Right now I'm
faced with a dilemma about a possible
commission.
I'm not quite happy with the circumstances under which the work would
be
presented. A number of my works have been for unusual
combinations.
In one case, the particular instrumentation was presented and I was
firmly
told that was the way it had to be, and I found that the piece became a
rather interesting challenge to be met. Another work from a few
years
ago, for clarinet and piano four hands, is probably the only extent
work
of its kind.
BD: Have you
written any operas?
GW: No, I haven't
and I doubt if I will. From time
to
time in the past I've had a small amount of interest, but the idea of
working
with a librettist bothers me somewhat. I have thought about
subjects
or plots that I might find workable from a musical point of view, in
the
sense that they would seem to make the effort and time worthwhile to
create
a good work. But working with a librettist or even writing my own
is something I just haven't been able to face.
BD: When you're
writing a piece of music, how do you know
when it's finished? How do you know when to put the pen down and
decide there's no more tinkering to be done?
GW:
The moment I stop and think, "When can I finish it?"
[Laughter] I like to get it finished as soon as possible. I try to find a logical point to end the piece. I'm not willing to allow it to go on and on and on, and then come back to decide where it should have been stopped.
[Laughter] I like to get it finished as soon as possible. I try to find a logical point to end the piece. I'm not willing to allow it to go on and on and on, and then come back to decide where it should have been stopped.
BD: Is the act of
composition fun for you?
GW: I don't
regard music as fun at all. This
is
not to say I don't enjoy it, but maybe there is some kind of deep
Puritan
ethic I have that tells me I have to work at something and try to make
it as good as possible. I am relieved when it's finished and feel
that I have put together something that I can live with without being
embarrassed
or having to question it.
BD: Do you ever
go back and revise works?
GW: Usually when
I finish something there may be a note
here
or a rhythm there that bothers me and I don't quite know a more
satisfying
solution or replacement. If time passes and I go back, I'm
usually
able to find something that is more satisfying, but I work slowly
enough
that I must avoid any wholesale revision. I try to work very
carefully
when I start so I don't have to sort it out and start again.
BD: I just
wondered if there were any old versions that
musicologists
will have to sort out later.
GW: I don't work
that way. I try to work from
beginning to end and try to arrive at a completely satisfying work with
a few things that need to be punched up. Sometimes it takes a
little
time to do it, but there are no wholesale revisions.
BD: Is it
generally wrongheaded for musicologists to try
and
look through composers' wastebaskets?
GW: Different
composers have different approaches to
composition.
I think the wrongheadedness is related to trying to incorporate things
the composer had obviously discarded into something that the composer
intended
to keep. I'm thinking specifically of the Symphonic Etudes
of Schumann. Pianists these days are including in their
performance
some variations which were not published by Schumann, and in virtually
every instance are inferior to what he decided to publish. This
is
done to generate interest. Discovering a 'new' work of someone
becomes
a long-lost masterpiece. The value of the discovery is
inflated.
It may deserve to be played, but it's usually far from being a
masterpiece.
In the long run, though, things even out and we know what the good
things
are and what's not so good.
BD: Should there
be a place in the repertoire for pieces
that
are less than great?
GW: The
so-called standard repertory is very narrow,
and it's really a matter of elevating pieces that are sure-fire to a
certain
plateau. They are undoubtedly well-composed and well-structured
and
bear repetition. When you talk about pieces that are less good,
the
question becomes how much repetition can they stand?
BD: Then let me
ask an indelicate question - how much
repetition
can the music of George Walker stand?
GW: That, again,
is one of my primary objectives.
I'm
not really concerned with pleasing the public. I can't please the
public because I don't know what the public wants. Even if I know
what the public wants, I don't know that I could give it to them.
I try to write something I'm going to be able to live with and hope
that
others will begin to find some of the things that I feel have given
certain
strength to the music. I don't really believe in creating
something
that doesn't have any strength.
BD: Are you
conscious of the public at all when you're
writing?
GW: I never think
about the public. I never think
about
the performer. I have a great deal of respect and admiration for
performers from a technical point of view. If it's within the
range
of their instrument, they can do it. Knowing that, I don't worry
about whether or not it's going to be done.
* *
*
* *
BD: As you
approach your 65th birthday, is there anything
that has especially surprised you either about your own music or music
in general?
GW:
I couldn't say that I'm surprised. I felt all along that I would
possibly get into synch with the world. I was clearly out of
synch
for a long time. I was ahead of my time as a pianist when the
concert
managers didn't want to accept a black pianist. I was writing
music
that wasn't performed except by a few people for a long time, and I
made
an effort to concentrate on getting my music published with no success
initially and then little success, and all of a sudden I made the
acquaintance
of Paul Kapp, a very remarkable man who died a few years ago, and who
published
the bulk of my music because he believed in it. To him I owe an
enormous
amount of gratitude because without those publications, the
performances
of my music would be limited. He had a firm belief that it was
important
and should be widely heard, and the publication has provided me with a
base to attempt to widen the awareness of my music.
BD: You brought
up the situation of discrimination against
the black performer. Has this situation improved over the years
as
much as you would like?
GW: No, it hasn't
improved as much as I would like.
Obviously I've had some wonderful opportunities, but considering the
kind
of satisfaction and critical praise my music has gotten, it would seem
to me that I would have deserved even more performances by orchestras
other
than the New York Philharmonic. They have done five works of
mine.
Chicago, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, St. Louis have done none. From
the point of view of the success of the Black Composers Series of LPs,
the praise was heaped upon them in general and specifically about
certain
of my works. I've been trying to find out if they will be
re-issued
on CD, but so far the full set is only due for release as an LP Box on
the College Music Society label.
BD: I don't want
to belabor the point, but I want to ask
about
how you're listed in various reference books. They give your name
and your birth date, and say, "Black American composer and
pianist."
Would you rather it just be "Composer and pianist?"
GW: There are two
sides to that. I've benefited from
being a Black Composer in the sense that when there were symposiums
given
of music by black composers funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, I
would
get performances by orchestras that otherwise would not have done the
works.
The other aspect, of course, is that if I were not black, I would have
had a far wider dispersion of my music and more performances.
It's
a two-edged sword and I think that one can take the stance that if you
remove "black" from my name, it's going to be more meaningful because
I'm
still an outsider and will continue to be an outsider from the coterie
of well-known and established white composers. Of course I'd like
to have more performances by major orchestras because this is the area
in which you reach the wider public.
BD: More so than
recordings?
GW: If they don't
know your name it's unusual for them to
buy discs of your music. Of course if they read the reviews
a lot of people have become interested, particularly if they associate
a review with a particular medium. I don't know how many
performances
there have been of my Trombone Concerto, but when the work was
written
in 1957, Emory Remington, who was then teaching trombone at Eastman,
said
it could only be played by a couple of trombonists in the whole
world.
Now trombonists everywhere know the work, but there are few who ever
have
the opportunity to play solo with a major orchestra. I had to be
persuaded to have a piano reduction made of the orchestral part.
I was against it even though it seems almost kind of ridiculous to be
against
publication, but I thought it would not do justice to the piece.
BD: You wanted a
concerto not a sonata!
GW: That's right,
and I wanted all the colors associated
with
the orchestral textures. But my publisher kept after me and I
finally
said all right. Now trombonists know that the piano reduction is
available.
BD: Did you do
the reduction yourself?
GW: Yes I did.
BD: Then it's at
least that much authentic!
GW: Yes.
But coming back to the idea of reading
reviews,
sometimes a pianist will read a review of one of my sonatas and he or
she
might be interested in finding out whether it's something that would
lie
well in their hands or not. But this is done on an individual
basis
and I know it happens. Whereas you have an orchestral performance
and all of a sudden there is a work out there in front of many people
at
once. It's not going to be completely comprehended but there are
program notes and a biography and there is this group assembled to
absorb
the music.
BD: Are you
optimistic about the future of music?
GW: I don't
really think about the future of music. I always felt
that
there's an effort to try to predict that music was going in some
direction,
and after five or ten years it's obvious that that direction was
leading
nowhere and composers saw that. At the same time I'm against the
"Music of the Future." This is nonsense from my point of
view.
First of all, I don't really think that there are any geniuses of the
sort
of Mozart and Beethoven around to 'direct' music into any particular
style.
Secondly, it just occurred to me today that the most important figures,
at least from the 18th and 19th centuries, were composers who weren't
really
concerned with the future of music - meaning the experimentalists who
think
they had to find something by banging on a tin can in a parking
lot.
I'm talking about the persons who, on the basis of their awareness of
the
past and their own kind of personal intensity, have actually created
synthesis.
It's the synthesis that creates, for the most part, the works of
importance.
This is not to say that the works are going to be looking
backwards.
Any kind of creative effort must attempt to say something new, and if
it's
not a conscious attempt, it's a subconscious attempt to reveal
something
that is new from the point of the composer's background, experience and
output.
BD: Is this the
advice you have for young composers?
GW: Young
composers must look ahead, but I don't try to
advise
young composers because those who have talent are obviously looking
ahead
and if their talent develops they will undoubtedly have the good sense
to look not only ahead but also around them and absorb what there is
from
the past and present, and still think in terms of what they can forge
for
themselves that is different. I don't really know any young
composers
who are serious about developing into important composers. If
there
is enough talent and patience and hard work, they will eventually be
able
to come to terms with what they want to do and what they can do.
My concern is not just writing one work or two works, but building a
repertory
of works.
BD: We hope that
it continues for many years.
A few days later, I received this
letter
from the composer.
© 1987 Bruce Duffie
This conversation was recorded on the telephone on February 14,
1987. Portions were broadcast on WNIB in June of that
year,
and again in 1992 and 1997.
This transcription was made in 2004 and posted for use in New Music Connoisseur in their
Spring issue.
To see a full list (with links) of interviews which have been
transcribed and posted on this website, click here.
Award
- winning
broadcaster
Bruce Duffie was with WNIB, Classical 97 in Chicago from 1975
until
its final moment as a classical station in February of 2001. His
interviews have also appeared in various magazines and journals since
1980,
and he now continues his broadcast series on WNUR-FM, as well
as
on Contemporary Classical Internet Radio.
An American Outsider
http://georgetwalker.com/articles.html
George Walker
Articles
- The Audiophile Voice
- Barnes and Noble
- Fanfare Magazine
- HBCU College Algebra Reform Consortium
- Library of Congress
- Musical Quarterly
- New Music Connoisseur
- New York Times
- Philadelphia Inquirer
- Piano and Keyboard Keyboard Magazine
- Positive Feedback
- Scarecrow Press
- Star-Ledger
- Stereophile
- Yahoo Biography
- Washington Post
The Audiophile Voice:
- Interview with Dr. George Walker, Volume 2, no. 4
Barnes and Noble:
- "Walker has honed the
thorny modernist techniques of his earlier work into a style of great
emotional espressivity...The masterful text-setting (Lilacs) is accompanied by
imaginative, evocative orchestral writing."
- Walker (Peter Burwasser, July/August 1997)
HBCU College Algebra Reform Consortium
-
Newsletter of the HBCU College Algebra Reform Consortium, Vignette- George Walker
- The Lot of the Black Composer by George Walker (Keynote address from 1992 Unisys African-American Composers Forum)
- Four Poems (original) by George Walker
Musical Quarterly:
-
George Walker is one of the most highly regarded and successful composers of the late twentieth century. (Musical Quarterly, Fall 2000)
New Music Connoisseur:
- A wonderful birthday tribute (May 2003)
- A Pulitzer Winner's Overnight Success of 60 Years (Ralph Blumenthal, April 11, 1996)
- Make Room for Black Classical Music (George Walker, November 3, 1993)
- A Career Composing Classical Music (Joseph Deitch, July 15, 1990)
- A Composer Who Backed Into the Business (Glenn Plaskin, January 10, 1982)
- A Serious Composer Talks About the Path to Success (New Jersey Section, Terri Lowen Finn, February 8, 1981)
Philadelphia Inquirer:
- Yes, he's a great composer (Leslie Valdes, October 31, 1996)
Piano and Keyboard Keyboard Magazine:
- Walker has made an
important and rewarding contribution to the piano repertoire...
music of originality without artificiality, born of his imagination and his search for
precise expression.
contents
Positive Feedback:
- A great composer who's been at his job for over fifty years.
Scarecrow Press:
- The Black Composer Speaks: Interview with George Theophilus Walker (1978)
Star-Ledger:
- Looking Past the Prize (Mark Adamo, January 19, 1997)
- Music community says Pulitzer long overdue (Michael Redmond, April 14, 1996)
Stereophile:
- The Music of George Walker (Dan Buckley, November 1997)
Washington Post:
- Hometown Hommage To a D.C. Composer (Joseph McLellan, June 8, 1997)
Yahoo Biography:
-
His acknowledged masterpiece is for solo piano, the Sonata no. 2
Home
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/music/2015/08/20/d6e9e6c2-3beb-11e5-9c2d-ed991d848c48_story.html?utm_term=.4e0a661d1215
Photographer Frank Schramm had just moved to Montclair, N.J., when he heard one of Walker’s pieces playing on the local public radio station. He sent Walker an e-mail, not having any idea where he lived. Turns out, they were in the same town. Walker dropped Schramm a tape. The photographer began taking pictures. That was 2004. Schramm, who has continued photographing the composer, provided the Washington Post with these images.
Born: 1922
First piano lesson: 1927
First recital, Town Hall, New York City: 1945
First black tenured faculty member, Smith College: 1961
First Pulitzer Prize for African-American in composition: 1996.
There
are no deadlines. There is nothing to prove. George Walker, 93, writes
music because he wants to. “I don’t know what relaxation is,” the
Pulitzer Prize-winning composer admits. Walker also talks about his many
chores as he sits in his living room in Montclair. Two high-end
(Polymer) floor speakers stand a few feet away. The Steinway is in the
next room. So are the sheets of music he’s working on and a stack of
CDs. “I do everything. I do my own cooking. I do my laundry. I do my
cleaning.” Oh, and that symphony. Walker has been working on it for four
months. The D.C. native – he grew up in the northwest section of the
city - isn’t sure who will perform it. First, Walker has to finish it.
Why keep working? “I want more people to hear my work,” he says. “I want
people to get acquainted with my music.”
He works most
days, sitting at the piano. “I’m not like Brahms getting up at 5 o’clock
and having a cup of coffee. But I’m thinking all the time about
possibilities. About what I can use. And I spend very little time
actually writing because I don’t like to revise. If I wrote three notes
one day, the next day I might erase two and leave one. It’s very
intensive, especially now. I’ve come to the point where I can find
something and say, ‘Aha, I’ve already done that.’
“There’s
always a possibility of finding something. It’s basically the choice
that one makes. The pitch. The rhythm. It also has to do with the
harmony. Trying to figure out why one particular chord sounds right and
what note should change.”
Early lessons
Miss
Mary L. Henry was his first piano teacher. Walker started taking
lessons at the age of 5. “The piano was in the parlor. It was an
upright. Most everybody had a piano. It was simply a matter of finding a
teacher to teach. She came in and once a week, I would have a lesson.
When you’re a kid you have to be told that — to practice. The famous
story about Stravinsky when he was composing ‘The Rite of Spring’ in the
apartment and there was a kid outside shouting to him — ‘That’s wrong’ —
and Stravinsky was saying, ‘No, this is right, this is right, son.’
Same thing happened to me. When I first started out, my mother would be
in the kitchen and I’d be fumbling around on the piano and she would
say, ‘That’s not right.’ She said, ‘Don’t do it again.’ ”
On Sherman Avenue
Walker’s
father was a Jamaican immigrant who graduated from medical school at
Philadelphia’s Temple University in 1918. His mother worked in the
Government Printing Office after graduating from high school. “Our
household was extremely busy because my father had his office
downstairs. The street, Sherman Avenue, was a lovely street at the time
with arching trees. That’s one of the major changes that I really feel
strongly was a result of the effort to focus on business by widening the
street. To allow buses to go without ever stopping. Straight down this
whole avenue.”
The contemporaries
He
is a tough sell. Walker has reservations about many of today’s
composers. “If you don’t have a sense of formal design, if you don’t
have any real sense of harmonic coordination, if you don’t even have a
sense that music has to breathe, it’s going to be uncoordinated. Almost
in every period you have composers who are extremely well-trained. We’re
in a period where technique is not an option. It’s not taught as an
option. The fact of the matter is that if one’s to go back to composers
who wanted to change things and do something different and yet managed
somehow to retain some of the aspects of composition that the other
masters had completely absorbed. You have to go back to Stravinsky,
Hindemith. I have issues with them, but they’re not the same issues that
I would find with the so-called contemporary composers of the late 20th
century. Elliott Carter, it was kind of pathetic what he was doing after 80 or 90 years.”
The Pulitzer
Walker’s winning piece, “Lilacs for voice and orchestra,” used the words of Walt Whitman and was first performed by the Boston Symphony Orchestra in 1996.
How did the Pulitzer change his life? “I got probably more publicity nationwide than perhaps any other Pulitzer Prize-
winner. But not a single orchestra approached me about doing the piece or any piece. My publisher didn’t have sense enough to push. It materialized in nothing.”
winner. But not a single orchestra approached me about doing the piece or any piece. My publisher didn’t have sense enough to push. It materialized in nothing.”
On being black
“It’s
the first thing that comes to most people’s mind. That if you’re in
music, you must play jazz. You don’t play jazz? I can’t believe it. It’s
a stereotyping that is sort of endemic. It doesn’t bother me. I realize
and I recognize this is how people think. If I were to be deterred by
that, as some black performers had been — I’ve heard any number of
people who have said, ‘When I started to take piano lessons, my teacher
told me, “You ought to play jazz.” ’ It’s the implication there that
this is something that comes more naturally to you. I think the world of
classical music is really complex in the sense that you never quite
know why things don’t go your way all the time. Management had arranged
for me to have an audition with someone from [the Ravinia Festival]. So I
played for him. He said, ‘Well, maybe we can arrange for you to play
“Rhapsody In Blue.” ’
When they play it right
“I remember when I worked on ‘Dialogue for Cello and Orchestra’
with the Cleveland Orchestra. And I went to the first rehearsal and the
orchestra played so wonderful I was almost overwhelmed. Sometimes, I
can’t think of another occasion in which I was so moved. It sounded even
better than I could have anticipated. I don’t remember the feeling. I
simply remember there was a sense of amazement that I had written this
piece. It’s not like anything else you’ve ever heard. And for them to
have played it in a way that I really could not find anything to object
to.”
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
George Walker: Concise and Precise
The shocking massacre at the Emanuel African Methodist
Episcopal Church in downtown Charleston, South Carolina, in June 2015
prompted composer George Walker to pay tribute to its nine victims in
his latest orchestra work, Sinfonia No. 5.
“I decided I would write my own texts, a few lines given to five
different speakers, and to show a photo of Charleston,” Walker explained
when we visited him at his home in Montclair, New Jersey. “I had been
to Charleston before the massacre, but I was uncertain that I had been
in the church where the massacre occurred. I found out that I had not,
but the horrific events that occurred there and elsewhere will always
remain etched in my imagination.”
While it’s certainly not the first time a composer felt compelled to
create music in response to a great tragedy, what makes Walker’s case
much rarer is that when he completed the composition last year he was 94
years old. When we visited Juan Orrego-Salas in 2014,
just a few weeks after his 95th birthday, he told us he stopped
composing shortly after he turned 90, claiming that he had written all
he had to write. Admittedly, there have been some significant works by
nonagenarians—Havergal Brian’s last two symphonies, Jeronimas
Kačinskas’s fourth string quartet, Leo Ornstein’s last two piano
sonatas, and tons of pieces by Elliott Carter, who then went on to
compose 18 works after his 100th birthday. But, to the best of my
knowledge, Walker’s new symphonic work is the only such piece by a
living composer that age. Certainly, it’s the only work by a prominent
living nonagenarian whose music has been featured on dozens of
recordings and who has received the Pulitzer Prize in Music.
But what perhaps makes Walker’s story even more unusual is that while
he is now arguably the eldest statesman among still-active composers,
he began his career as a child prodigy. He started studying the piano at
the age of five, composing as a teenager, and had become something of a
cause célèbre by his early 20s. He made his New York piano recital
debut at Town Hall at the age of 23 in a program of mostly standard
repertoire, which also featured three of his own compositions. In a
review published the following morning in The New York Times,
Walker was hailed as “an authentic talent of marked individuality and
fine musical insight.” The following year, Walker’s still popular Lyric for String Orchestra (originally titled Lament),
which he had arranged from a movement of his first string quartet
written in memory of his grandmother, received its premiere in a radio
broadcast conducted by his Curtis classmate and good friend Seymour
Lipkin.
“Seymour had always wanted to be a conductor,” Walker remembered. “I
said to him, ‘If I add a double bass to the second movement of my
string quartet, would you play it?’ Just like that. … It was just right
on the spot. And he said yes. So I rushed home and put the parts
together and gave it to him and they played it.”
Following this initial success, Walker began a wide range of works,
spanning repertoire for solo piano, chamber ensembles, symphony
orchestra, chorus, and numerous songs. Throughout the ensuing seven
decades, he has remained a staunch champion of traditional classical
forms—to date, he was written ten sonatas, two string quartets, and
formidable concertos for piano, violin, cello, and trombone. Yet his
music has been hardly retrogressive. “When you can’t get beyond
Sibelius, you’re an idiot!” he animatedly quipped at one point. And
over the course of nearly three quarters of a century, his music grew
considerably more complex, often veering toward atonality. He even
briefly flirted with serialism in his 1960 solo piano composition Spatials.
“I always felt that there are certain limitations to 12-tone music, but
I wanted to prove to myself that I could write a short work that was
strict,” he opined. “[O]ne can achieve a certain freshness within the
limitations of the repetitions of the kind of sonorities that one can
expect from 12-tone music, because it doesn’t go on for too long.”
If there’s any quality that distinguishes all of Walker’s music it’s
its conciseness and preciseness. Maybe that’s why he has now composed
five relatively brief works he has titled sinfonias and has eschewed the
composition of large-scale symphonies. “Things that are overly
embellished, or that are too rich, just don’t suit my temperament,” he
acknowledged. “The sinfonias are all extremely concise works.… [T]he
idea of conciseness as opposed to an extended work was always in my mind
when writing these pieces; I thought that they also might be easy to
program, which they have not been.”
There was a somewhat uncharacteristic touch of disappointment in
Walker’s voice as he said this—Walker is always extremely poised and
disciplined. His aesthetics remained seemingly impervious to passing
trends. But he’s now 95 and has still not been able to secure a date for
the premiere performance of Sinfonia No. 5. However, never one to wait
for others to make things happen, Walker hired an orchestra, the
Sinfonia Varsovia, and a conductor, Ian Hobson—who together have now
recorded virtually all of Walker’s orchestral compositions for Albany
Records—to make a studio recording of his new work so at least he can
hear it. He’s hoping to release it within the year so others can listen
to it as well. He played us the first proof following our lengthy
discussion through a high-end audio system that takes pride of place in
his living room. It is visceral music, totally appropriate given the
subject matter to which he was responding. But there are also moments of
tenderness and beauty. It is music that offers hope, which is extremely
cathartic, even though, for Walker, beauty might be a by-product but it
is not an explicit goal.
“I don’t think in terms of creating beauty,” Walker pointed out. “If
the effect is such that people get a sense that this is beautiful,
that’s fine. But they’re missing so much. I want to create elegant
structures.”
Frank J. Oteri: In an interview with Thomas May that was published in Strings magazine at the end of June,
you mentioned that you began composing just to release energy after
long hours of practicing the piano. It’s pretty amazing to me that some
of the first fruits of that part-time release of energy were your
gorgeous Prelude and Caprice for piano. But it’s more amazing to me
that you almost didn’t become a composer. We’re very lucky that you
did.
George Walker: Yes, it’s rather astonishing. One of
my reasons for being in college was to have the opportunity of playing
on the tennis team, which I had done and given up; I played freshman
tennis. In my autobiography I mentioned that I met another freshman in
my first year at the Oberlin Conservatory; his name was Bob Crane. I
asked Bob, “What’s your major?” And he said composition.
I’d never heard of anyone majoring in composition. My limited
background had been associating with persons who were interested in
learning how to play the piano. And in Washington, D.C., where I grew
up, I had two close friends who studied the violin. But not
composition. So then I asked him, “What are you writing?” And he said a
fandango. I’d never heard of a fandango before. I had a strong
background with French and Latin, so I knew it wasn’t French and I knew
it wasn’t Latin. It sounded Spanish.
“I’d never heard of anyone majoring in composition.”
Then in my junior year at Oberlin, I had been fortunate in obtaining
the very first job I ever had in my life. I had become the organist for
the Oberlin Theological Seminary. When I came to Oberlin, I had not
ever played the organ. My first organ teacher was Arthur Crowley. He
sensed that I could be an organist and I played in an organ recital in
my very first year. Then I studied with Arthur Poister, who had played
from memory all the works of Bach. So I got to know many of the great
Bach works; I had a great respect for Bach. And I played a work of Leo
Sowerby from memory on a month’s notice, the Passacaglia from his
symphony. As the organist for the Oberlin Theological Seminary, I had
access to the organ at any time of the day, particularly at night. I
would go almost every night and improvise on the organ, like Bach. I
had a morning service five days a week in which I would play hymns. And
at the end of each service, I would improvise something.
FJO: Did you write any of those down?
GW: I never wrote down anything. The improvisation
was my earliest attempt at exploring harmonic developments that were
unusual to conclude. In my music, I think in almost every piece,
there’s a different type of cadence. So there’s a carryover from that.
FJO: Another thing you said in that interview with
Thomas May was that you thought that studying composition would make you
a better pianist. But I think, in fact, what happened was that playing
the piano and also playing the organ early on made you a better
composer. It made you write idiomatically for instruments and to be
sensitive, and, because the organ literature is so filled with
counterpoint, it inspired you to create music that is filled with inner
voices.
GW: But then I decided that I was going to
discontinue my organ studies because I had been chosen to play
Tchaikovsky’s First Piano Concerto with the Oberlin Conservatory
Orchestra, and I wanted to concentrate on my senior recital. So in
making the decision to discontinue with the organ, I thought I’d try one
semester of composition to see what it’s like. So the very first
semester of my senior year, I took composition with Normand Lockwood,
who was the composition teacher there. In that one semester I was
introduced to some songs of Charles Ives and, not to Le Sacre du Printemps by Stravinsky, but to his Symphony of Psalms.
The semester was spent essentially going from writing a single vocal
line to writing a line with accompaniment, then finding a text and
setting that text. The song that I set to the text of Paul Lawrence
Dunbar [“Response”] emanates from that.
FJO: It’s that early?
GW: That early.
FJO: It’s a beautiful song.
GW: Shortly after that, after I discontinued my
lessons, I wrote the Caprice. The Prelude and Caprice are linked
together, but the Prelude was written for my New York debut; the Caprice
was the first work I ever wrote for piano. Then when I went to Curtis, I
wanted to be able to spend five hours a day practicing the piano. At
Oberlin, I was involved in so many more things, just even going from
building to building and looking for a piano to practice on. But the
classes at Curtis were less significant in terms of what one was
expected to do for them and in them. I had a lesson a week with [Rudolf]
Serkin, then I’d go back home and practice. I found myself walking
almost a mile to the library to listen to recordings at night, but still
I had a lot of energy. Then one day I encountered one of the students
at Curtis and in the conversation I found out that he was studying
composition with Rosario Scalero. I asked him what he was writing, and
he said he was doing counterpoint. I had had four years of counterpoint
at Oberlin along with fugue and canon, so I thought, “Well, if that’s
all he’s doing, I can do that!” I spoke to [the registrar] Jane Hill,
who scheduled everything, and I asked her if it would be possible for me
to submit something to Scalero to be considered to be a student of his,
even though he’d already selected his students for that year. And she
said she would be willing to do it. So the two pieces that I submitted
were “Response” and the Caprice.
FJO: To go back even earlier than when you were at
Oberlin, to be so immersed in the sound world of classical music growing
up in D.C. was very unusual. Although recordings were starting to
become available of some of the standard repertoire, they still weren’t
very common. So I’m curious about how you came to know and love this
music. I know there was a piano in your home growing up.
GW: Music came into my life from what my mother
had. The books that she had acquired and I assume that she must have
bought when she was in high school or after she was in high school. She
bought the piano that I first started to bang on. My first teacher,
when I started out, had me playing things out of [John] Thompson, but
there was a certain curiosity I suppose for me when I learned that I
could read music. When I found that I could do that, I started to
explore and I went through everything that mother had acquired. I would
ask her when she would go downtown to do shopping to look for certain
things, and she would go to the music store and bring them back.
FJO: So maybe you’d play one piece by a composer
and then you would want to play the others. When did you start making
those associations?
GW: For some reason, I think I had a sort of innate
taste for what I liked, and I chose what I liked. Schirmer Music, for
example, used to have several excerpts of works printed on the back of
sheet music that you would buy. I would play through those and I’d say
to myself, “I like this.” I think I developed a sense of discrimination
quite early about what I liked and what I didn’t think was worth
anything.
FJO: What would be an example of that?
GW: Well, when I started with my second piano
teacher, I was introduced to a lot of what was considered contemporary
music like Cyril Scott, [Selim] Palmgren, [Edvard] Grieg, and [Erno]
Dohnányi. Cyril Scott with those luscious chords was too luscious for
me.
FJO: Why were they too luscious?
GW: I don’t know whether there’s something innate
that relates to my father, who was very direct, almost taciturn, very
precise. But things that are overly embellished, or that are too rich,
just don’t suit my temperament.
FJO: Interesting. It’s also interesting that your
parents were always fine about you becoming a musician. They were both
completely supportive.
“Things that are overly embellished, or that are too rich, just don’t suit my temperament.”
GW: They never said anything to the contrary.
FJO: And your father was a doctor.
GW: Yes.
FJO: He didn’t want you to become a doctor?
GW: My father never broached the idea of my taking
over his office, which was downstairs, or even taking courses that would
lead to a medical degree. I knew his friends. I was very fond of his
friends— physicians, dentists, West Indians. There was something so
remarkable about my father.
FJO: You were also very close to your grandmother.
GW: Yes.
FJO: Her death prompted you to write the work that became your first huge success as a composer, the gorgeous Lyric for Strings,
which is a string orchestra arrangement of one of the movements from
your first string quartet. I’m curious how that piece came about.
GW: I had been fortunate in being given a Town Hall
recital by Efrem Zimbalist. After that recital, which was very
successful, I played the Third Piano Concerto of Rachmaninoff with
Eugene Ormandy and the Philadelphia Orchestra, and that was very
successful. I had graduated from Curtis, and since I was living in
Philadelphia, I asked at Curtis if I could continue to study with
Rosario Scalero. I still had the use of my piano, which was loaned from
Curtis, but I didn’t want to study with Serkin; I didn’t want to study
the piano. I had obtained the diploma in piano and composition, so this
was a rather unusual request, but they were so nice. When they agreed
to the idea, I had already decided that I would like to write a string
quartet. This came about, I think, in part because the summer after my
first year at Curtis, my mother insisted that although I was at Curtis,
and although it’s a very prestigious institution, I should have a
master’s degree, which I would not be getting from Curtis. So I went
[back] to Oberlin in the summer to begin work on a master’s degree, and I
met a person with whom I was supposed to be studying composition,
Ludwig Lenel. He was actually the godson of the great German organist
and musicologist Albert Schweitzer. I had been introduced to Lenel by my
teacher Arthur Poister when he first came over from Germany because
Poister wanted me to show Lenel how the organ in our chapel worked. He
was a composer of sorts, so I was going to take composition along with
piano towards a master’s degree. It was not a very happy choice. But in
talking with him about composition, he brought up the Ravel String
Quartet. I knew the Debussy String Quartet. I listened to the Ravel and
I never heard the use of so many things in that work before. It
fascinated me. I didn’t want to write like Ravel and I didn’t want to
write like Debussy, but the medium [then] fascinated me more so than
writing any other work. My graduation piece for my diploma in
composition was a violin sonata.
FJO: That’s a work you no longer acknowledge.
GW: That’s correct. I thought there was a little taste of Brahms in there, which I didn’t want to expose.
FJO: Did you destroy the piece, or did you save it?
GW: I never saved it. It was performed, and it was
reviewed very well. Scalero liked it. Scalero suggested I send it to
the Bearns Prize at Columbia University; he liked it that much. It was
the only time anybody at Curtis had ever suggested that I submit
anything for an award. But I didn’t feel that it had enough of an
individualist quality to it, so I didn’t keep it. I didn’t know what I
could do after that, so I concentrated on the string quartet.
FJO: And as you were writing it, your grandmother with whom you were very close, died.
GW: When she passed, it was like a realization that
our family was crumbling. She and my mother were like sisters. Without
my grandmother, my mother had no one to talk to. My father was not a
very talkative person, and he was in and out of the house. He had
patients. He was downstairs in the basement, or he was out doing this
or that. My grandmother lived in our house. She was in her late ’80s or
early ‘90s. When we were going off to school in the morning at eight
o’clock, she was downstairs sitting down and having breakfast with us
every morning. And every morning, she was in the kitchen helping my
mother peel potatoes or apples. Many times she was washing dishes, and I
was wiping dishes for her. Yet she never went out of the house. For
someone to have endured what she had to have endured, not to have even
talked about it, and yet, when I would say Toscanini is on in ten
minutes, she and my mother would come into the library and listen.
FJO: So it’s so fitting that you memorialized her
by taking a movement from your string quartet and arranging it for
string orchestra and that it actually received its premiere on the
radio. She would have loved the music that you wrote.
GW: Yes.
FJO: But how did it wind up getting premiered on the radio?
GW: I was in the so-called Common Room at Curtis
and I saw Seymour Lipkin. We were very close friends—Seymour and I began
to study with Serkin at the same time. After my audition to enter
Curtis, my father had met me at Penn Station, taken a cab, and he waited
for me until after the audition. I’ll never forget, it was raining just
like today, and my father had his rubbers wrapped up in a newspaper,
and we were about to leave. Just as we got to the door, we were called
back by the registrar and asked to go upstairs. We went upstairs and
were ushered into a room, and there the secretary Mr. Mathis said, “We
want to tell you that you’ve been accepted.” And in two minutes, in
comes Seymour and they tell him the same thing. He had been a student
at Curtis, but it has always been a rule that when your teacher leaves
for any reason at all, his students are out. So Seymour had to audition
again and Serkin had taken him.
Anyway, in the Common Room Seymour tells me, “I’m conducting these
concerts on the radio with a string orchestra.” It turned out to be
some concerts sponsored by a bank. Seymour had always wanted to be a
conductor. And I said to him, “If I add a double bass to the second
movement of my string quartet, would you play it?” Just like that. I’d
never spoken to anybody about that. Of course I knew Barber had done
that, but I never talked about it in front of anybody else. It was just
right on the spot. And he said yes. So I rushed home and put the
parts together and gave it to him and they played it. It was called Lament because of my grandmother.
FJO: What made you change the name from Lament to Lyric?
GW: Because I knew there was a work of Howard Hanson called Lament for Beowulf
So when the conductor at the Mellon Art Gallery, Richard Bales, chose
to do it on a program, I changed it to Adagio, and he played it, and it
was reviewed as Adagio. But that was too close to the Barber so I decided against retaining that title.
FJO: But there are loads of Adagios and there are also loads of Laments. In fact, you wrote a gorgeous art song called “Lament.”
GW: That was the title of a Countee Cullen poem I
found after I moved to New Jersey. I came here in ’69. I don’t remember
how I got that volume of poems; it must have been from the ’70s, but I
have it here.
FJO: There’s a comment you made about writing music in your autobiography that I’d like to talk more about with you. You wrote that writing music is not so much about inspiration as it is about the force of will.
GW: Yes, I had to make up my mind about what I
wanted to do because I realized that for me, the beginning is so
important. The beginning consists of finding the right notes and finding
the right rhythm, then trying to determine what the character of that
beginning is and how it will progress. I can’t say that I can translate
anything that I see or read or hear into that without trying to script
what will fit satisfactorily in a way that will give me the confidence
to continue.
FJO: You also said recently to somebody that when
you compose music, that’s the time that the ideas come—the notes, the
rhythms, and everything. If you’re not working on a specific piece of
music, you don’t necessarily have music running through your head.
GW: Things change. I find right now with my
obsession with the Sinfonia No. 5 that I’m constantly rethinking what I
have done and trying to find alternatives that I could have chosen. It’s
become almost a bit annoying that I just can’t completely put it
aside. But I think that has been an unusual type of diversion from the
way I normally work. In the past, I’ve always avoided trying to keep
ideas in my head.
FJO: Just for the sheer practicality of wanting to move on to the next piece after you finish writing something?
GW: Yes.
FJO: But what you say about force of will rather
than inspiration and being able to compartmentalize when you create a
musical idea is very contrary to the myth that many people believe about
composing music. You must have this tune in your head that you have to
get out. And you rush home to a piece of paper or you write it in the
back of a car. For you, it’s always been much more systematic. You
compose only during certain hours in the day. Maybe this came about
because you began composing after hours of practice, and you had to have
specific time set aside for composing.
GW: Well, I do have ideas that come to me.
Sometimes I feel lazy if I don’t find a piece of paper and a pencil and
put them down, but it doesn’t mean—and I have tried this—that they turn
out to be significant. And I don’t actually work every day by any
means. Sometimes I don’t work over a period of time. I only jot down a
few notes at a time. But what I do find is that I can come back and
pick up where I left off. There is continuity despite the discontinuity
in terms of time. I’m not at a loss when I sit down and find that after
six notes, I don’t know where I am.
“I can come back and pick up where I left off. There is continuity despite the discontinuity in terms of time.”
FJO: What’s so interesting about the whole
inspiration question and the myth of inspiration is that it also ties
into the belief in how something beautiful is created, as well as the
whole notion of what beauty is. I think of pieces like the First String
Quartet and the Lyric, but also the Cello Sonata and the
Trombone Concerto. To my ears, these are all extremely beautiful
pieces. But you probably didn’t start out having a specific melody in
your head for any of them. These beautiful melodies emerged from what
you were putting together when you came up with the structure for these
pieces.
GW: Yes. And, as a matter fact, I don’t think in
terms of creating beauty. I can understand how people may get a little
annoyed about the fact that I seem to be more concerned about things
like the technical aspect of composition, but I think that is what
enables me to find the things that somehow manage to become a part of
the fabric that people recognize. As I look back, I think about so many
things in almost every work that people do not notice that are very
important. For example, in the Trombone Concerto, there’s a consistent
dissonance in the first moment, but people aren’t affected by that
dissonance. And when the trombone melody comes in, the melodic aspects
are so unconventional; I’m using nine or ten different notes in that
melody. That’s the same with the Passacaglia of my Address for
orchestra. The great C minor Passacaglia for organ by Bach is so
conventional in its use of tonic relationships. When you have something
that’s literally modulating and comes back, to be able to do something
like that is, to me, more interesting as a composer. If the effect is
such that people get a sense that this is beautiful, that’s fine. I
want to create elegant structures.
FJO: So listeners being able to discern this level of detail is important to you.
GW: It is very important.
“I don’t think in terms of creating beauty… but
if the effect is such that people get a sense that this is beautiful,
that’s fine.”
FJO: But a lot of people who listen to music,
especially now and even among people who love this music, don’t
necessarily have the training to recognize this level of detail.
GW: That’s right.
FJO: There are also a lot of people who don’t know
about this music or don’t listen to it because they feel that they don’t
have the training to appreciate it. We’re losing a lot of potential
listeners who might love your music, if only they heard it.
GW: Yes. I do feel that at this point it’s
wonderful that people should have the opportunity to hear the music
whether it’s on YouTube or the radio or whatever, just to hear it
whatever way they can. I don’t like the idea of people not paying for
music, but I’m more than resigned to it at this point because it’s the
only way. I feel great satisfaction to know that it’s possible for them
to hear it.
FJO: But if they’re not noticing the details you
wish they could comprehend, what can we do to have people hear it in a
deeper way for you? What would be an ideal listening experience for
somebody listening to your music?
GW: I think the only ideal situation is just listening to it more than once.
FJO: Repeated listening is very important.
GW: Yes.
FJO: You mentioned Address, which is a
phenomenal orchestra piece and it was a huge success when it was finally
performed, nearly a decade after it was written. It took a long time
for the whole piece to be performed. That piece was completed around
the time of your studies with Nadia Boulanger. So many very different
composers studied with Boulanger. Some of them credit her with improving
their contrapuntal skills, but this was already a key feature in your
music from your years of studying organ music and studying counterpoint.
Others say they learned all these interesting chords, but you mentioned
that you were not interested in luscious chords. Still others claimed
that she helped them to find their own voice. You already wrestled with
this issue when you discarded your early violin sonata. So what did
Nadia Boulanger give to you as a teacher?
GW: From the outset, Nadia Boulanger, in the very
first lesson said, “You’re a composer.” She said, “Your music has
power.” The other composers—Carter and Piston and all of them—were
green about counterpoint and doing harmony. I didn’t have to do that. I
just brought in whatever I wanted to and showed it to her. She had
nothing to say except, “Keep going.” But it was she who arranged for me
to play my First Piano Sonata in Paris. And she arranged for me to play
it in Fontainebleau after she’d given me a scholarship. She arranged
to send the First Sonata to the Lili Boulanger Competition. She paid to
send it herself directly to Piston. She wrote a letter of
recommendation for a second year of study, which was turned down by the
USIS. The recommendation meant nothing to them. She did everything she
could for me.
FJO: So, even if you already knew the direction you wanted to take as a composer, she was an important mentor for you.
GW: Yes. She had the realization that I was capable
from my first song. I didn’t show her any big works. She never saw my
Trombone Concerto. The first things that I showed her were my songs. I
showed her “A Bereaved Maid” and she said that’s a masterpiece. She
saw the two piano sonatas. That was enough.
FJO: There was an evolution happening in your music that had already started before your studies with her; it almost seems like those studies were a detour and that your music ultimately went in a direction that had nothing to do with her. Your music in the 1950s was getting more and more chromatic.
GW: Well, something that was pointed out to me is the Lyric
is not necessarily a simple piece. It alternates between major and
modal. In touching upon modes, it became chromatic. But the chromaticism
comes about from my interest in expanding the harmonic vocabulary to
include dissonance as a part of the harmonic palette, not in dissonance
that is totally disconnected from something. One of the extraordinary
things about Mozart was the way that he could move from the diatonic
into the chromatic and back again. You don’t have that in Beethoven.
“Chromaticism comes about from my interest in expanding the harmonic vocabulary.”
FJO: There’s an anecdote you tell in your
autobiography, from before you were studying with Boulanger and were
pursuing a D.M.A. at the Eastman School, about buying a used LP
recording of the Berg Violin Concerto. That was your introduction to
12-tone music.
GW: I had actually discovered this second hand
recording of the Berg. It was not a very good recording. [Eastman’s
director] Howard Hanson had an absolute disdain and dislike for 12-tone
music. So at Eastman, no one was writing 12-tone music, except this one
poor fellow who was dismissed.
FJO: He was dismissed for writing 12-tone music?
GW: Every year they would have this series of
readings with Hanson. And this one student composer had a piece. Hanson
had a stack of pieces and when he would finish a piece, he would put the
score on the stack and turn around, call the composer, and so on. But
when he finished the piece of this student composer, he just put it on
the stack and never bothered to call him over.
FJO: So you were very brave to want to want to go in this direction as composer. [They both laugh.] So when did you first have the idea of using a tone row in your music?
GW: In 1960. I always felt that there are certain
limitations to 12-tone music, but I wanted to prove to myself that I
could write a short work that was strict, because by that time,
composers had started to realize they can’t be too strict about it and
started letting in things they liked over something that really doesn’t
sound so good. So I wrote Spatials. It’s a work that is in
variation form and is strict—and is short, which I thought would make it
something that would enable one to understand that one can achieve a
certain freshness within the limitations of the repetitions of the kind
of sonorities that one can expect from 12-tone music, because it doesn’t
go on for too long.
“There are certain limitations to 12-tone music.”
FJO: So that’s the only piece of yours that’s really strictly 12-tone.
GW: Yes.
FJO: But, to my ear, 12-tone techniques seem to also inform the Second String Quartet. Is that true?
GW: No. The first movement of the Second String
Quartet is intended to be a kind of singular, lyrical expression of each
instrument, with a certain freedom so that it may sound as if it has
some relationship to something you might find in Carter, but I was not
thinking in terms of 12-tone.
FJO: I was curious because it sounds—to me at
least—like it had a 12-tone underpinning, but then you somehow subverted
it, especially in the last movement, which is this wonderful fugue. All
of a sudden these atonal lines start moving in a completely strict
fugal motion, which is a tonal idea. So I imagined that you somehow
created this wonderful synthesis between the 12-tone method and tonal
construction, which seemed like the ultimate homage to having listened
to the Berg Violin Concerto, because in that piece Berg was also
attempting a reconciliation of the 12-tone system with Baroque
counterpoint, as well as a very lush late-19th century Romantic sound
world.
GW: What I have done, and this is one of the
aspects of form that I was alluding to, is to use a fugue where there
are modulatory aspects to the subject and the answer. I take what is a
part of a sonata form and put in some new material. So you have
something that is linear and something harmonic that is not related to
the fugal material, and then it comes back to the fugal material. So
there is this alternation between different formal period types.
FJO: Despite being so interested in chromaticism,
you have remained very dedicated to using the quintessential
compositional structure for exploring diatonic tonality—the sonata form.
You’ve written five piano sonatas as well as two violin sonatas, a
cello sonata, and a viola sonata, plus concertos for trombone, violin,
cello, and piano. You’re clearly very committed to these classical
18th-century forms.
GW: Well it’s because there’s a solidity there that
one can come back to and find things, time after time, that are
interesting. One hates to think in terms of just Western civilization,
but this accumulation of techniques has not only been discovered, but
has been found to work so well. One should attempt to find a way to
continue with it rather than to throw everything out and say, “Let’s
start over again.” With what? It’s going back to attempting to create a
wheel that already exists. You don’t know how to put the spokes in the
wheel. Although so much has been done, it seems to me that there’s
still the possibility that one can find ways of extending what has
already been done. It’s not the end, like Scalero thinking, “Oh, we’ve
come to Sibelius; that’s the end.” That’s absolute nonsense. When you
can’t get beyond Sibelius, you’re an idiot! I don’t care. There are
wonderful things in the [Sibelius] Fourth Symphony; it happens to be my
favorite, but please don’t disregard all the other works. You can’t
listen to Stravinsky? You can’t listen to Gershwin? Oh, please.
“When you can’t get beyond Sibelius, you’re an idiot!”
FJO: Yet, one of the things I find interesting
about your catalog of compositions is that you have now written five
pieces that you’ve given the title Sinfonia; you seem to rather
purposefully avoid using the English translation of that Italian word,
symphony.
GW: I thought by calling these works sinfonias that
I would focus on the fact that these were not works in or were an
extension of the romantic tradition, large-scale works. They are quite
the opposite. The sinfonias are all extremely concise works. The first
one, which unfortunately has never had a professional performance after
it was commissioned by the Fromm Foundation, is only two movements. I
cannot understand why it has not been programmed. But the idea of
conciseness as opposed to an extended work was always in my mind when
writing these pieces; I thought that they also might be easy to program,
which they have not been.
FJO: Address, which has so rarely been
performed in its entirety, even though it only lasts about 20 minutes,
is longer than any of your sinfonias.
GW: Exactly. Right. Address is a more conventional three-movement work. It’s actually connected to Lilacs. The second movement of the Address is a kind of elegy that is related to Gettysburg.
FJO: I didn’t know that, although of course, I knew that Lilacs
was based on Walt Whitman’s famous poem “When Lilacs Last in the
Dooryard Bloom’d” which was written to eulogize Abraham Lincoln shortly
after his assassination toward the end of the Civil War. Frighteningly,
the deep-seated animosities of that era seem very current once again
these days, especially in the wake of the recent tragedy in
Charlottesville. It struck me when I learned that your Sinfonia No. 5
was inspired by the horrible massacre at the Emanuel African Methodist
Episcopal Church in Charleston in 2015 that, sadly, it’s an extremely
timely piece of music.
GW: This score is just like most of my scores. I
don’t start out with an idea or even with a title until I get into the
work. It was only after I had started the work that it occurred to me
that here is an opportunity to introduce something [about this]. I
decided I would write my own texts, a few lines given to five different
speakers, and to show a photo of Charleston. This was a port where
slaves were often brought. I had been to Charleston before the
massacre, but I was uncertain that I had been in the church where the
massacre occurred. I found out that I had not, but the horrific events
that occurred there and elsewhere will always remain etched in my
imagination. I have not witnessed them, but there is this reference in
the music.
“I don’t start out with an idea or even with a title until I get into the work.”
FJO: It seems that one of the only ways we can
overcome these horrific events is to increase people’s awareness of
them, and that is something that artists—poets, novelists, filmmakers,
choreographers, painters, sculptors, composers—can perhaps do in ways
that can make very specific tragedies somehow more universally resonant.
An effective artistic statement created in response to such a horrible
event can have the power to make people think and question and hopefully
not repeat these events in history.
GW: Well, the unfortunate thing is that you have
these marketing people for the orchestras who don’t understand the
importance. And you have these artistic administrators who don’t
understand that this is a timely thing. They’re only interested, of
course, in filling seats and the best way to do it is to get something
that has some immediate popular appeal. They don’t want this kind of
thing on their programs. They don’t want it. I’ve been trying to get
orchestras to do it. They won’t do it.
FJO: I read somewhere that it’s going to be performed by the National Symphony.
GW: In two years. They had a chance to do it next
season; they won’t do it. I don’t have even a specific date. They
won’t do it here in New Jersey. They won’t do it in Philadelphia. They
won’t do it in Austin.
FJO: It should be done during Spoleto, in Charleston.
GW: Yeah, but they don’t have an orchestra that’s
good enough. I’ve been trying for two years just to get someone to put
it in a slot. One likes to think that artists can change things. Well,
come on. We can’t change things. Look. I’ve been trying to change
things. My piece Canvas was trying to change things, but I got one performance after the premiere of Canvas.
FJO: And Canvas is a piece for wind band. Wind band pieces usually get picked up by groups all over the country.
GW: Exactly. Yes.
FJO: But it has not been?
GW: It has not been.
FJO: At least Lilacs has now been done quite a few times. And there are now two recordings of it.
GW: Yes, but still, initially Lilacs was
not done at all except for a performance out in California by a
community orchestra. Then, when they wanted to do one movement of Address in Atlanta, I said no, so then they decided to do Lilacs.
Then there was a conductor, William Houston, who was on the faculty at
William Paterson College here in New Jersey who had just been obsessed
with the idea of doing Lilacs, so he did Lilacs there. And about three months ago, it was done again in California. There haven’t been that many performances of Lilacs at all.
FJO: The fact that the vocal part could be sung either by a soprano or a tenor actually increases the possibilities for doing it.
GW: Absolutely.
FJO: And, of course the text for it is one of the
great American poems and it has been set by several composers who’ve
used it as a eulogy for many people besides Lincoln. When FDR died at
the end of World War II, Hindemith set this poem for chorus and
orchestra to memorialize him as well as all the people who died in the
war. And Roger Sessions’s setting of it was dedicated to the memory of
Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy. Your setting of it is much more
compact than either of these and it is more intimate as well—there’s
just one singer instead of a full chorus. I guess this also goes to what
you were saying about wanting to be concise and precise. You also used
only four of the poem’s thirteen stanzas, so it’s much shorter than the
Hindemith and Sessions settings.
“The repertoire for single voice and orchestra is extremely limited.”
GW: It had to do with the commission and the fact
that it was written to honor Roland Hayes, a singer who had achieved
international recognition eventually for his incorporation of spirituals
in classical musical programs. So there was never any question of using
a chorus. But I was extremely happy to be able to compose a work for
voice and orchestra because the repertoire for single voice and
orchestra is extremely limited. You have the Last Songs of Strauss and the Barber Knoxville [Summer of 1915]. I’d like it to be part of that repertoire.
FJO: My favorite moment in Lilacs is
probably in the last movement where you have this very detailed
orchestra sonority of flutes, woodblock, and pizzicato strings
accompanying the line “Sing on, sing on you gray-brown bird.” It’s
wonderfully evocative.
GW: Yes, and that’s where the spiritual comes in. I was very happy to be able to incorporate that.
FJO: You spoke before about people not hearing all
the details in your music. But if people would listen to your pieces
many times, they’d be more able to hear some of these subtle details.
When I was listening again to your Violin Concerto earlier this week, I
was suddenly riveted at the end of the second movement by one single
harpsichord chord. It’s the only time you can hear the harpsichord in
the whole piece. It’s just there as a punctuation, but it’s very
effective once you know it’s there. That’s another very precise
orchestration detail.
GW: That’s right. And in Lilacs, there’s
something that is not heard. It’s so irritating. At the very end in the
score, there’s a maraca. I’ve told conductors to get them to play it
louder, and the conductor will say, “Well, I hear it.” Well, you may
hear it, but I don’t hear it. And it’s not on the recording. Somehow
you have to deal with these people who don’t want to take the time to
make certain things come out. That’s very significant, the maracas at
the end.
FJO: Being so committed to this level of detail and not getting it can be very frustrating.
GW: It’s frustrating because there’s no way even to irritate them. It’s all over. People like to think you’re collaborating with the conductor. You’re not collaborating. He’s standing up there. And you go up and you say, “Please can you ask them to play it louder.” “Yeah, O.K. Play it louder.” But when I come back up and say, “I didn’t hear it.” “Well, I heard it.” Well, what can you do? The session is over. Then you have these compromises where they don’t want to hire someone to play the one chord in the harpsichord, because they have someone who’s playing the piano. But he can’t get over to the harpsichord in time.
FJO: I guess that’s an argument for writing more chamber music because with chamber music, you can usually get what you want.
GW: Yes.
FJO: We talked a bit about your string quartets,
which are extremely detailed. I’d like to talk a bit more about your
many songs for solo voice and piano, which you have written throughout
your life. It’s an extremely intimate combination, but you can do so
much with it. And you do. Your text setting is very effective and
you’ve set some really great poems—Emily Dickinson, a setting of a poem
by Thomas Wyatt that I think is wonderfully eerie and powerful, your
early Paul Laurence Dunbar setting we talked about, and—one of my
favorites—that “Lament” by Countee Cullen that you said you set after
getting a book of his poems in the 1970s. So when you’re reading, does
that move you to hear music in your head for certain poems? How do you
choose a text that you set to music?
GW: It depends on the subject matter, but also upon
the rhythm of the verse and the consistency of the meaning in the
text. I have a feeling for the vowels in the words and I can extend
them, maybe use a melisma and somehow make that poem more enticing. It’s
not just a literal repetition of the words; somehow it has an aura.
It’s a combination that I feel is associated with the idea of lieder
where you have equal parts. The accompaniment is as important as the
vocal line.
FJO: Considering how sensitive your text setting is, both in all of your songs and in Lilacs, it’s a shame that you never wrote an opera.
GW: I had an opera course with Menotti, and I was
an opera coach at Eastman. Even with my background, I don’t know that I
could manage it. To a certain extent, I realize that my independence is
a deficit; I just cannot collaborate with people. I know what composers
have had to go through with collaboration. I have a friend who told me
all the problems he has had composing an opera. And I could never
really decide on the subject I wanted to choose. I’ve turned down
subjects offered to me. So it’s not likely I’m going to tackle one.
“I realize that my independence is a deficit; I just cannot collaborate with people.”
FJO: So what are you working on now?
GW: Nothing right now. I’m really just essentially trying to get a recording out.
FJO: Of the Sinfonia No. 5? There’s a studio recording of it?
GW: I have a first proof. You want to hear it?
FJO: Yes, I’d love to listen to it when we finish
talking. This is very exciting. Even if a live performance has not been
scheduled until 2018, people will still be able to hear this piece on a
recording. And it’s a piece that you just completed last year at the
age of 94. This is very rare. There have been only a handful of people
who have composed music past the age of 90. Leo Ornstein wrote two
piano sonatas. The British composer Havergal Brian was writing music in
his 90s. And Elliot Carter was still composing at the age of 103. You
still seem to be at the height of your powers as a composer. Your
Sinfonia No. 4, which you wrote at the age of 89, is extraordinary. I
can’t say anything conclusive about the Fifth Sinfonia until after I’ve
heard it, but from just peering through the score you showed me before
we started this conversation, it seems like you’re still searching,
you’re still wanting to grow and expand, which I think is very inspiring
to all composers.
GW: Yes, I just don’t want to repeat myself. That
has always been in the back of my mind. Having somehow found things
that I think have a certain individuality, I want to find a way to twist
and turn them so that they don’t sound as if they’re something that
I’ve used before. That is an aspect of the conversation that I think
all composers are faced with after a while. People say, “If only Mozart
would have lived and kept on writing.” But his style would not have
changed that much.
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121347117
Composer George Walker Writes For His Son
Hear the music
Composer George Walker Writes For His Son
"Didn't know about it until it was too late," the younger Walker deadpans. "He maintained the element of surprise. And I think, along with that, you're able to maintain an element of artistic control. And he's an expert at that."
George Walker doesn't entirely deny the jab about "artistic control," but the composer says he knew his son was up to the task.
"It's not a long work. But it's a very intense, difficult and challenging work for both the soloists, and the orchestra," says George Walker.
A Long Career Marked By Challenges And Firsts
George Walker has been writing intense, sometimes difficult music for more than 50 years. Walker was born in Washington, D.C. He was the first black pianist to give a recital at Town Hall in New York City in 1945. Walker studied composition with two of the best: Nadia Boulanger in Paris and Rosario Scalero at the Curtis Institute of Music in Philadelphia. But success as a composer didn't come easily.
"I had to find my own way," says George Walker. "A way of doing something that was different; something that I would be satisfied with."
Walker's patience was rewarded in 1996, when he became the first black composer to win the Pulitzer Prize for Music, for the piece Lilacs.
Even Gregory Walker admits it took him a while to understand his father's music.
"I just was weaned with his particular approach to the art from time when I didn't understand what he was going for, when it was just as abstract to me as it can be for other lay listeners," says the younger musician. "But in time — with different kinds of exposure — I've really learned to embrace and hopefully communicate what he has in mind."
Though none were written with him in mind, Gregory Walker has made a specialty out of playing his father's previous compositions — they've even recorded together.
The Premiere That Almost Wasn't
The younger Walker is also the concertmaster of the Boulder Philharmonic Orchestra in Colorado. When George Walker sat down to write his new Violin Concerto, he knew he wanted his son to give the world premiere.
"I wanted him to have the opportunity of performing a work on a larger scale, for a larger audience than he ever done before," says the composer. "I had hoped that I could persuade at least one orchestra to allow him to play it."
It almost didn't happen. The Philadelphia Orchestra was in talks to perform the concerto at Carnegie Hall earlier this year — with a different violinist. George Walker said no. But his son Gregory admits he's not the kind of superstar soloist whose name alone can sell tickets.
"We know that there are other people who, if they set their minds to it, can play this music," Gregory Walker says. "That's one of my main aspirations: that I can at least hold the torch long enough, without singeing myself, to pass it on to a great player who can make a vehicle of it, and really deliver it to the wider audience it deserves."
His father jumps in. "I'd like to correct that," says George Walker. "The fact is that in insisting that he play the concerto, I was aware that he could do justice to the work. Don't for a minute think that there's anybody who's going to play it better than he. Don't for a minute think that."
What George and Gregory Walker both hope is that their collaboration will bring attention to one piece and two careers — that deserve more of it.
https://bestthingsny.com/event/95th-year-celebration-with-pianist-george-walker-2018-04-02-rochester-ny.html
95th Year Celebration with Pianist, George Walker
Monday, Apr 2, 2018 at 7:30pm
433 East Main Street
585-274-1000
Free
The Eastman School of Music is proud to celebrate the 95th birthday year of composer and pianist George Theophilus Walker in a special alumnus recital in Hatch Recital Hall at Eastman, followed by a champagne toast and reception in Wolk Atrium for the audience. The recital, comprised of the complete (5) piano sonatas of George Walker, will be performed by Albanian pianist Redi Llupa, with opening remarks by Jamal Rossi, the Joan and Martin Messinger Dean at Eastman.
The first African American to graduate with a Doctorate from Eastman in 1956, and the first African-American composer to win a Pulitzer Prize (for Lilacs for Voice and Orchestra) in 1996, George Walker’s Eastman accolades also include an Alumni Achievement Award in 1975 and the Rochester Distinguished Scholar Medal in 1996.
“It was fortuitous for me to read an article in the New York Times in 1954 about the DMA Degree created by Dr. Howard Hanson at Eastman when I was teaching at Dillard University, a small black private college in New Orleans,” Walker recalls. “I applied for admission into the graduate program and was extremely happy to receive a fellowship. During that time Dr. Hanson proposed that DMA candidates could select a project that was not a dissertation for the DMA Degree. I chose to compose my Piano Sonata No. 2. This work has become one of the most performed American piano sonatas.”
That piano sonata, along with four others, will make up the program for Walker’s 95th birthday celebration at Eastman. “Having all five of my piano sonatas performed by Redi Llupa in a celebration of my music is very special. They represent additions to the repertoire of piano literature that should be known.” Walker adds on a personal note, “My son, Gregory, will participate in the celebration by playing my Sonata for Violin and Piano No. 1.”
Walker’s career and legacy is brimming with accomplishments and successes. He blazed the trail for many African-American musicians by being; the first black instrumentalist to appear with the Philadelphia Orchestra, the first black instrumentalist to be signed by a major management, the National Concert Artists; the first black tenured faculty member at Smith College; first recipient of the Minority Chair established by the University of Delaware; and the first composer to receive the Whitney award. George Walker has composed over 90 works for orchestra, chamber orchestra, piano, strings, voice, organ, clarinet, guitar, brass, woodwinds, and chorus.
“George Walker is one of the most prolific and accomplished American composers of the last century. In addition to having been awarded the coveted Pulitzer Prize, he has been honored by some of our nation’s leading cultural organizations including the American Academy of Arts and Letters, and the American Classical Music Hall of Fame,” shares Dean Jamal Rossi. “We are very proud to consider Dr. Walker as one of Eastman’s most distinguished alumni, and I am privileged to know him as a friend.”
Walker’s works have been performed by virtually every major orchestra in the United States, and by many in England and other countries. His awards include the Harvey Gaul Prize, MacDowell Colony, Yaddo and Bennington Composer Conference Fellowships, two Guggenheim Fellowships, two Rockefeller Fellowships, a Fromm Foundation commission, two Koussevitsky Awards, an American Academy of Arts and Letters Award, a Mary Flagler Cary Charitable Trust Award, the Mason Gross Memorial Award, numerous grants from the Research Councils of Smith College, The University of Colorado, Rutgers University, the National Endowment for the Arts, and the New Jersey Council on the Arts. He has received two Alumni Awards from the Eastman School of Music, the University Medal from the University of Rochester (1996), honorary doctorate degrees from Lafayette College (1982), Oberlin College (1983), Montclair State University, Bloomfield College, Curtis Institute of Music (1997) and Spelman College (2001).
It is fitting that Walker’s 95th birthday musical celebration will be at Eastman, as one of the featured pieces is one he wrote while attending as a student. “I am most grateful for the continuity of my connection with Eastman, a wonderful institution,” Walker reflects. “The support that Eastman has given me since I graduated in 1956 has been truly amazing.”
The George T. Walker 95th Birthday Year Celebration recital is free and open to the public.
THE MUSIC OF GEORGE WALKER : AN EXTENSIVE VIDEO OVERVIEW, A CROSS SECTION OF RECORDINGS, MUSICAL ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY, PLUS VARIOUS INTERVIEWS GEORGE WALKER:
GEORGE WALKER: "Lyric for Strings" (Original Version)
GEORGE WALKER: Sonata No. 1 for Piano (1953)
GEORGE WALKER: Sinfonia No. 3 (2003)
GEORGE WALKER: Sinfonia No. 5, "Visions" (excerpt)
George Walker Lyric for String (Muti-the Philadelphia Orch.)
George Walker Music #01
GEORGE WALKER: "Music for Three" (1971)
George Walker: Concerto for Cello & Orchestra (1981)
George Walker, composer
GEORGE WALKER: "Icarus in Orbit" (2004)
George Walker (Three Songs)
GEORGE WALKER: "Movements" for Cello and Orchestra
George Walker: Concise and Precise
Lyric for Strings - George Walker
GEORGE WALKER: Violin Concerto (2008)
Lilacs for Voice and Orchestra: :I
GEORGE WALKER plays BRAHMS: Piano Concerto No. 2
Redi Llupa | George Walker, Piano Sonata No. 3
GEORGE WALKER: Sonata No. 2 for Piano
AfriClassical: Frank Schramm interviews George Walker on YouTube
GEORGE WALKER plays MOZART Sonata in E-Flat Major
https://vimeo.com/231604140
https://vimeo.com/231726098
https://vimeo.com/231603848
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Walker_(composer)
George Walker (composer)
George Walker (holding the score) going over his Address for Orchestra with Benjamin Steinberg of the Symphony of the New World, 1968
George Theophilus Walker (born June 27, 1922) is an African-American composer, the first to win the Pulitzer Prize for Music. He received the Pulitzer for his work Lilacs in 1996.[1]
Walker is the father of two sons, violinist and composer Gregory T.S. Walker,[2] and playwright Ian Walker.
He was admitted to the Oberlin Conservatory that same year, where he studied piano with David Moyer and organ with Arthur Poister. In 1939, he became the organist for the Graduate School of Theology of Oberlin College. Graduating at 18 from Oberlin College with the highest honors in his Conservatory class, he was admitted to the Curtis Institute of Music to study piano with Rudolf Serkin, chamber music with William Primrose and Gregor Piatigorsky, and composition with Rosario Scalero, teacher of Samuel Barber.[6] He graduated from the Curtis Institute with Artist Diplomas in piano and composition in 1945, becoming one of the first black graduates of the music school.[7]
He was the first black instrumentalist to appear with this orchestra. The following year, he played Brahms' 2nd Piano Concerto with the Baltimore Symphony, Reginald Stewart conducting, and the 4th Beethoven Concerto with Dean Dixon and his orchestra. In 1950, Walker became the first black instrumentalist to be signed by a major management, the National Concert Artists.[9] In 1954, he toured seven European countries, playing in the major cities of Stockholm, Copenhagen, The Hague, Amsterdam, Frankfurt a Main, Lausanne, Berne, Milan and London.[10]
Upon returning to the United States, he taught at Dillard University in New Orleans, Louisiana for one year before entering the Doctor of Musical Arts degree program at the University of Rochester's Eastman School of Music in 1955.[11] In 1956, he became the first black recipient of a doctoral degree from that institution as well as the recipient of a second Artist Diploma in piano.[12]
George Walker was awarded both a Fulbright Fellowship and a John Hay Whitney Fellowship in 1957. He spent the next two years in Paris studying composition with Nadia Boulanger. In 1959, he embarked upon another international tour, playing concerts in France, Holland and Italy. After a recital in London’s Wigmore Hall in 1963 sponsored by Mrs. Zimbalist, he received an honorary membership in the Frederic Chopin Society there.[13]
Walker's distinguished academic career continued in 1960 with faculty appointments to the Dalcroze School of Music; the New School for Social Research,[14] where he introduced a course in aesthetics; Smith College (1961–68), where he became the first tenured black faculty member; the University of Colorado Boulder (1968–69) as visiting professor; Rutgers University (1969–92), where he served as chairman of the music department for several years; the Peabody Institute of Johns Hopkins University (1975–78); and the University of Delaware (1975–76), where he was the recipient of the first minority chair established by the University.
He has given master classes in numerous institutions, including the Curtis Institute of Music, the Oberlin Conservatory of Music, the University of Colorado Boulder, Columbia University, Wayne State University, Wellesley College, Temple University, Washington University in St. Louis, Williams College and Montclair State University.[15]
In 1946, Walker composed his String Quartet no. 1. A string orchestra arrangement of the second movement of that work received its world premiere in a radio broadcast that was conducted by pianist Seymour Lipkin. Originally titled Lament, Walker later changed the title to Lyric for Strings.[16] It is now one of the most frequently performed orchestral works by a living American composer.[17] His subsequent body of work included over 90 works for orchestra, chamber orchestra, piano, strings, voice, organ, clarinet, guitar, brass, woodwinds, and chorus.[18]
In 1998, he received the Composers Award from the Lancaster Symphony and the letter of Distinction from the American Music Center for "his significant contributions to the field of contemporary American Music."[20] He was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Letters in 1999.[21] The following year, George Walker was inducted into the American Classical Music Hall of Fame.[citation needed]
Over the next several years, he received numerous awards including the Dorothy Maynor Outstanding Arts Citizen Award (2000), Classical Roots Award from the Detroit Symphony (2001), the A.I. Dupont Award from the Delaware Symphony (2002) the Washington Music Hall of Fame (2002), and the Aaron Copland ASCAP Award (2012). He is the recipient of two Guggenheim Fellowships,[11] two Rockefeller Fellowships,[11] a Fromm Foundation commission, two Koussevitsky Awards, and an American Academy of Arts and Letters Award,[22] as well as honorary doctorate degrees from Lafayette College (1982), Oberlin College (1983), Bloomfield College (1996), Montclair State University(1997), Curtis Institute of Music (1997), Spelman College (2001), and the Eastman School of Music where he gave the Commencement Address (2012).[23]
His autobiography, "Reminiscences of an American Composer and Pianist", was released in 2009 by Scarecrow Press.[24]
Walker is the father of two sons, violinist and composer Gregory T.S. Walker,[2] and playwright Ian Walker.
Contents
Biography
Early life
George Theophilus Walker was born in Washington, D.C. on June 27, 1922. His father emigrated from Kingston, Jamaica[3] to the United States where he became a physician after graduating from Temple University School of Medicine.[4] Walker's mother, Rosa King, supervised her son's first piano lessons when he was five years old. His first teacher was Miss Mary L. Henry. Mrs. Lillian Mitchell Allen, who had earned a doctorate in music education, became his second piano teacher.[5] Before graduating Dunbar High School, George Walker was presented in his first public recital at age 14 at Howard University's Andrew Rankin Memorial Chapel.[citation needed]
He was admitted to the Oberlin Conservatory that same year, where he studied piano with David Moyer and organ with Arthur Poister. In 1939, he became the organist for the Graduate School of Theology of Oberlin College. Graduating at 18 from Oberlin College with the highest honors in his Conservatory class, he was admitted to the Curtis Institute of Music to study piano with Rudolf Serkin, chamber music with William Primrose and Gregor Piatigorsky, and composition with Rosario Scalero, teacher of Samuel Barber.[6] He graduated from the Curtis Institute with Artist Diplomas in piano and composition in 1945, becoming one of the first black graduates of the music school.[7]
Career
Walker was presented in a debut recital in Manhattan's Town Hall. With this "notable" debut, as it was described by The New York Times, he became the first black instrumentalist to perform in that hall.[8] Over the course of the next five decades, he balanced a career as a concert pianist, teacher, and composer. Two weeks after his New York debut, he performed Rachmaninoff's 3rd Piano Concerto with the Philadelphia Orchestra conducted by Eugene Ormandy as the winner of the Philadelphia Youth Auditions.
He was the first black instrumentalist to appear with this orchestra. The following year, he played Brahms' 2nd Piano Concerto with the Baltimore Symphony, Reginald Stewart conducting, and the 4th Beethoven Concerto with Dean Dixon and his orchestra. In 1950, Walker became the first black instrumentalist to be signed by a major management, the National Concert Artists.[9] In 1954, he toured seven European countries, playing in the major cities of Stockholm, Copenhagen, The Hague, Amsterdam, Frankfurt a Main, Lausanne, Berne, Milan and London.[10]
Upon returning to the United States, he taught at Dillard University in New Orleans, Louisiana for one year before entering the Doctor of Musical Arts degree program at the University of Rochester's Eastman School of Music in 1955.[11] In 1956, he became the first black recipient of a doctoral degree from that institution as well as the recipient of a second Artist Diploma in piano.[12]
George Walker was awarded both a Fulbright Fellowship and a John Hay Whitney Fellowship in 1957. He spent the next two years in Paris studying composition with Nadia Boulanger. In 1959, he embarked upon another international tour, playing concerts in France, Holland and Italy. After a recital in London’s Wigmore Hall in 1963 sponsored by Mrs. Zimbalist, he received an honorary membership in the Frederic Chopin Society there.[13]
Walker's distinguished academic career continued in 1960 with faculty appointments to the Dalcroze School of Music; the New School for Social Research,[14] where he introduced a course in aesthetics; Smith College (1961–68), where he became the first tenured black faculty member; the University of Colorado Boulder (1968–69) as visiting professor; Rutgers University (1969–92), where he served as chairman of the music department for several years; the Peabody Institute of Johns Hopkins University (1975–78); and the University of Delaware (1975–76), where he was the recipient of the first minority chair established by the University.
He has given master classes in numerous institutions, including the Curtis Institute of Music, the Oberlin Conservatory of Music, the University of Colorado Boulder, Columbia University, Wayne State University, Wellesley College, Temple University, Washington University in St. Louis, Williams College and Montclair State University.[15]
In 1946, Walker composed his String Quartet no. 1. A string orchestra arrangement of the second movement of that work received its world premiere in a radio broadcast that was conducted by pianist Seymour Lipkin. Originally titled Lament, Walker later changed the title to Lyric for Strings.[16] It is now one of the most frequently performed orchestral works by a living American composer.[17] His subsequent body of work included over 90 works for orchestra, chamber orchestra, piano, strings, voice, organ, clarinet, guitar, brass, woodwinds, and chorus.[18]
Awards and Recognition
In 1996, Walker became the first black composer to receive the coveted Pulitzer Prize In Music for his work, Lilacs for Voice and Orchestra, premiered by the Boston Symphony, Seiji Ozawa conducting. Washington, D.C. Mayor Marion Barry proclaimed June 17, 1997 as “George Walker Day”.[19] in the nation's capitol.
In 1998, he received the Composers Award from the Lancaster Symphony and the letter of Distinction from the American Music Center for "his significant contributions to the field of contemporary American Music."[20] He was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Letters in 1999.[21] The following year, George Walker was inducted into the American Classical Music Hall of Fame.[citation needed]
Over the next several years, he received numerous awards including the Dorothy Maynor Outstanding Arts Citizen Award (2000), Classical Roots Award from the Detroit Symphony (2001), the A.I. Dupont Award from the Delaware Symphony (2002) the Washington Music Hall of Fame (2002), and the Aaron Copland ASCAP Award (2012). He is the recipient of two Guggenheim Fellowships,[11] two Rockefeller Fellowships,[11] a Fromm Foundation commission, two Koussevitsky Awards, and an American Academy of Arts and Letters Award,[22] as well as honorary doctorate degrees from Lafayette College (1982), Oberlin College (1983), Bloomfield College (1996), Montclair State University(1997), Curtis Institute of Music (1997), Spelman College (2001), and the Eastman School of Music where he gave the Commencement Address (2012).[23]
His autobiography, "Reminiscences of an American Composer and Pianist", was released in 2009 by Scarecrow Press.[24]
Major compositions
- A Red, Red Rose for Voice and Piano
- Abu for Narrator and Chamber Ensembles (Network for New Music commission)
- Address for Orchestra
- An Eastman Overture (Eastman School of Music commission)
- Antifonys for Chamber Orchestra
- Bleu for Unaccompanied Violin
- Cantata for Soprano, Tenor, Boys Choir, and Chamber Orchestra (Boys Choir of Harlem commission)
- Canvas for Wind Ensemble and Narrator (College Band Directors National Association commission)
- Cello Concerto (New York Philharmonic commission)
- Concerto for Piano and Orchestra (National Endowment for the Arts Commission)
- Concerto for Violin and Orchestra (Philadelphia Orchestra premiere with Gregory Walker Gregory T.S. Walker, soloist)
- Da Camera (Musica Reginae commission)
- Dialogus for Cello and Orchestra (Cleveland Orchestra commission)
- Emily Dickinson Songs
- Five Fancies for Clarinet and Piano Four Hands (David Ensemble commission)
- Foils for Orchestra (Hommage a Saint George) (Eastman School of Music commission)
- Folk Songs for Orchestra
- Guido's Hand (Xerox commission)
- Hommage to Saint George (Eastman School of Music premiere) (Eastman School of Music commission)
- Hoopla: A Touch of Glee (Las Vegas Philharmonic premiere)
- Icarus In Orbit (New Jersey Youth Symphony premiere)
- In Praise of Folly (New York Philharmonic premiere)
- Lilacs for Voice and Orchestra (Symphony Boston premiere)
- Lyric for Strings
- Mass for Soloists, Chorus, and Orchestra (National Endowment for the Arts commission)
- Modus (Cygnus Ensemble commission)
- Movements for Cello and Orchestra (University of Illinois premiere)
- Music for 3
- Music for Brass (Sacred and Profane)
- Music for Two Pianos
- Nine Songs for Voice and Piano
- Orpheus for Narrator and Chamber Orchestra (Cleveland Chamber Orchestra premiere)
- Overture: In Praise of Folly
- Pageant and Proclamation (New Jersey Symphony commission)
- Perimeters for Clarinet and Piano
- Piano Sonata No. 1
- Piano Sonata No. 2
- Piano Sonata No. 3
- Piano Sonata No. 4
- Piano Sonata No. 5
- Poem for Soprano and Chamber Ensemble (National Endowment for the Arts commission)
- Poeme for Violin and Orchestra (Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra premiere)
- Psalms for Chorus
- Serenata for Chamber Orchestra (Michigan Chamber Orchestra commission)
- Sinfonia No. 1 (Fromm Foundation commission)
- Sinfonia No. 2 (Koussevitsky commission)
- Sinfonia No. 3
- Sinfonia No. 4 (2013 premiere by New Jersey Symphony at Carnegie Hall)
- Sinfonia No. 5 "Visions" (2 versions, 1 with voices and 1 without)
- Sonata for Two Pianos
- Sonata for Viola and Piano
- Sonata for Violin and Piano No. 1
- Spatials for Piano
- Spektra for Piano
- Spires for Organ
- String Quartet No. 1
- String Quartet No. 2
- Tangents for Chamber Orchestra (Columbus Pro Musica Chamber Orchestra commission)
- Three Pieces for Organ
- Two Pieces for Organ
- Variations for Orchestra
- Violin and Piano Sonata No. 2 (Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts premiere)
- Windset for Woodwind Quintet
References
- De Lerma, Dominique-Rene. "African Heritage Symphonic Series". Liner note essay. Cedille Records CDR061.
- Walker, George (2009) Reminiscences of an American Composer and Pianist, Scarecrow Press, p. 153
- "Walker, George Theophilus (1922- ) - The Black Past: Remembered and Reclaimed". Retrieved October 1, 2016.
- Walker, George (2009) Reminiscences of an American Composer and Pianist, Scarecrow Press, p. 2
- Walker, George (2009) Reminiscences of an American Composer and Pianist, Scarecrow Press, p. 13
- "The Pulitzer Prizes". Pulitzer.org. Retrieved October 1, 2016.
- "Curtis Institute of Music : Timeline". Curtis.edu. October 17, 1999. Retrieved October 1, 2016.
- Valdes, Lesley, "Yes, He's A Great Composer For George Walker, 1996 Pulitzer Prize Winner For Music And Dean Of Black Composers, That's Not Enough. He Wants His Prowess As A Pianist To Be Appreciated, Too," Philadelphia Inquirer, October 31, 1996
- Mickey Thomas Terry, Ingrid Monson and George Walker, The Musical Quarterly, Vol. 84, No. 3 (Autumn, 2000), pp. 372-88
- "Composer George Walker | PBS NewsHour". Pbs.org. April 10, 1996. Retrieved October 1, 2016.
- Plaskin, Glenn, “A Composer Who Backed into the Business,” NY Times, January 10, 1982
- Koskoff, Ellen, Music Cultures in the United States: An Introduction, Routledge, 2004, p320
- Walker, George (2009) Reminiscences of an American Composer and Pianist, Scarecrow Press, p. 105
- Butterworth, Neil, Dictionary of American Classical Composers, Routledge 2004, p. 483
- Siberz, Heidi. "George Theophilus Walker: February's Contemporary Composer". Indiana Public Media. Retrieved October 30, 2016.
- "George Walker: Concise and Precise". NewMusicBox.org. Retrieved September 5, 2017.
- "High Quality Classical Music Streaming | Hi-Res and CD Quality Online Streaming Subscription at ClassicsOnline". Classicsonline.com. Archived from the original on October 20, 2014. Retrieved October 1, 2016.
- An Online Reference Guide to African American History (2011)
- "George Walker: Prominent Composer & Washingtonian Grew Up on Sherman Avenue". Park View, D.C. December 24, 2012. Retrieved October 1, 2016.
- "Historical List of American Music Center Award Recipients". NewMusicBox.org. May 7, 2003. Retrieved October 1, 2016.
- "American Academy of Arts and Letters - Current Members". Artsandletters.org. Archived from the original on June 24, 2016. Retrieved October 30, 2016.
- "American Academy of Arts and Letters - Awards Search". Artsandletters.org. Archived from the original on June 24, 2016. Retrieved October 1, 2016.
- "Commencement 2012 :: University of Rochester". Rochester.edu. Retrieved October 1, 2016.
- George Walker. "Reminiscences of an American Composer and Pianist, By George Walker, 9780810869400 | Rowman & Littlefield". Rowman.com. Retrieved October 1, 2016.
- George Walker official website
- A 2017 Conversation with George Walker (includes video excerpts)
- George Walker interview by Bruce Duffie
- 2012 George Walker interview by Ethan Iverson
- George Theophilus Walker, African American Composer & Pianist at AfriClassical.com
- George Walker, Composer Documentary produced by NJTV