Transcript of conversation with David Baker
David Baker: One thing that I've found, that 
anywhere I go on earth, where there is music, more often than not, the 
music that we call jazz, the music that came out of America, is a music 
which is like the lingua franca of music to the rest of the world. I 
can't imagine a world without jazz, and the fact that it's a living, 
functioning, exciting organism. 
Jo Reed: That was NEA Jazz Master David Baker. Welcome to Art Works,
 the program that goes behind the scenes with some of the nation's great
 artists to explore how art works. I'm your host, Josephine Reed. Born 
In Bloomington, Indiana in 1931, David Baker has pretty much done it all
 in the world of jazz: he plays the trombone and the cello, composed 
more than 2,000 pieces of music including symphonic works as well as 
jazz. He led a big band in the late 50s/early 60s and is now conductor 
and artistic director of the Smithsonian Jazz Masterworks Orchestra. 
Heâs Chair of the Jazz Studies Department at Indiana University's 
Jacobs School of Music, and heâs written 70 books. Heâs received 
many honor, most particularly he was named an NEA Jazz Master in the 
year 2000. I spoke to David Baker recently and began by asking him what 
drew him to jazz. 
    David Baker: In my particular case, growing up 
in segregated America, because where I went to high school, it's a high 
school that was built in 1927 called Crispus Attucks High School, and it
 was built because it was the first of the segregated schools in 
Indiana. And so the music I heard on the radio in the black community 
was music of Louis Jordan, of Charlie Parker, of Dizzy Gillespie. So I 
was really drawn to that, and really to all music in fact, but that 
music was the music that I had access to and the music that I had a 
realistic chance of being a part of, because basically at that time, the
 symphony orchestras were not as open as they are now, and even there, 
it's still somewhat limited. And I certainly wasn't going to be writing 
opera. It was the music which was available to me. When I listened to 
the radio, listened to my parents talk, that's the music they were 
playing, that's the music they listened to. And I still believe that 
it's axiomatic that people love the music that they fall in love to.
    Jo Reed: And you were born in 1931, so when you were at Crispus Attucks, it was kind of the mid '40s then.
    David Baker: Yes. I graduated in 1949 from high 
school, and at that time, Indiana, particularly Indianapolis, had become
 a focal point for the rest of the country, as far as jazz goes. It gave
 us Wes Montgomery, JJ Johnson, Freddie Hubbard, Monk Montgomery, and it
 goes on and on. 
Jo Reed: Well you mention JJ Johnson. He was one of 
the first trombonists to really play bebop and he wasnât just from 
Bloomington, he went to the same high school as you, didnât he?
    David Baker: He sure did. Graduated in 1942, and
 he was my idol, because I chose to be a trombone player, and I can't 
tell you how many days I would go to school and go down the hall where 
they had the pictures of the people who graduated in 1942 and look at 
JJ, anticipating a time when hopefully I would meet him. And as it 
turned out, we did meet and he became my teacher, and a friend and a 
mentor. That story can be replicated a whole bunch of times with people 
in Indianapolis, who represented, I guess, the icons.
    Jo Reed: You met first JJ Johnson at the Lenox School of Jazz, is that right?
    David Baker: No, I didn't. The fact is, I knew 
JJ before, but I knew him in a much more casual setting, because I would
 see him, and when he would come to Indianapolis, I would just go up and
 remind him that I too come from Indianapolis, and he would ask my name 
again. And when I got to Lenox School of Jazz, JJ was my trombone 
teacher. And he would always say, "I donât do this for a living. I 
don't know how to teach, so here's what I'll give you." And it always 
was wonderful wisdom. And sometimes you'll have knowledge and more 
knowledge and none of it comes out finally as wisdom. But with JJ it 
was. He knew that he was not specifically a teacher, but all of the 
things that he did were the things he learned on the street, and he was 
able then to convey to us by simply telling us how he did it and why he 
did it, and what makes it go.
Jo Reed: The Lenox School of Jazz really was 
something. I mean it had such a simple premise: you get the world's 
greatest jazz musicians to teach jazz to promising young musicians. And 
even though it was open for such a short time, I think maybe three 
years, it really left a legacy. 
    David Baker: I can't think of anything that's 
more important to jazz education than the Lenox School of Jazz. I'll 
tell you why, it became the model, the paradigm for almost all the 
programs. And people really don't know this, which I find disturbing 
sometimes, and try to do what I can to help people understand, but with 
John Lewis and Gunther Schuller and you had people who actually had 
teaching experience in a university or in a high school. But you had 
people who were street cred, people like the Modern Jazz Quartet, the 
people like Sonny Rollins. And so you had this wonderful, wonderful, as 
Quincy Jones liked to call it âgumbo.â And I thought it's a 
beautiful way to say that what happened there is the reason why jazz 
classes exist at most of the universities, whether we're talking about 
Indiana University or North Texas, or even Berkeley.
    Jo Reed: I like gumbo, bringing a little bit of New Orleans up to the Berkshires. 
    David Baker: And what beautiful gumbo it is and was.
Jo Reed: David, you studied with George Russell who 
wrote the first theoretical contribution to come from jazz. He was very 
influential in your career, wasnât he?
    David Baker: And I think to really the life of 
jazz in America, because George, in my estimation, has been the most 
important theoretician to come out of this music. He's the only one, I 
think, that has found the system, or a set of systems, that have been 
verified. We find they work. We know they work. George Russell, over 
across those years when he left Cincinnati where he was born, put 
together a system that I've been unable to find any holes in it. And 
that's hard to say, because even in traditional theory, there are 
things, "Don't do this, don't do that. This doesn't work." But with 
George, he gave you all the tools, without demanding that you follow his
 route or whatever. He gave you the tools: this is it. These are the 
possibilities and you'll probably find other possibilities.
Jo Reed: I think we need to say what it is that 
Russell did. Very simply put he expanded harmonic language and he moved 
passed the major-minor system which dominated Western music for over 300
 years. And Russell encouraged his students to continue to push the 
music, to explore, didnât he?
    David Baker: Very, very much so. Well, in fact, I
 think he insisted. He said that's why the system was devised, why he 
came up with it, and he worked on it for many, many years. And in 1959 I
 think was the first time I had seen the results of what he had put 
together, because he had had tuberculosis. While he was in that 
hospital, he pulled all the parts together. Finally, it was presented in
 loose-leaf pages when we were at Lenox School of Jazz. A great man, 
probably one of the most important voices, because when you talk about 
Miles Davis, you talk about Gil Evans, all of them pay homage to him for
 the fact that he brought an order to information that they possessed.
    Jo Reed: You played in his sextet, didn't you?
    David Baker: Yes, I was one of the founding 
members of his sextet, and let me tell you, those were the most exciting
 years of my life. And it's the reason why really I decided to settle 
in, because I could have played and done the other things I do, compose.
 But because of George as the model, and in fact, George's having 
convinced me, as well as many other people, how important that would be 
the transmission of this information. And fortunately, he was able to 
bring it to fruition at New England Conservatory where he taught and the
 private students that he had, and they are numerous. And every one of 
them is a part of the George Russell legacy.
    Jo Reed: As you mentioned, you started playing 
the trombone, but then you had an accident that affected your playing. 
What happened and when did it happen?
    David Baker: Well, the accident actually took 
place in 1953, a car accident where they didn't expect that I would 
live. I was thrown through the front. This was before seatbelts. We had 
the accident. Somebody hit the car that I was in and I was thrown 18 
feet through the front window. And they had already started funeral 
proceedings. And I think that God in my life makes a big, big 
difference, because these are the things that led me to other paths, 
other routes to take. Had I not had that accident in 1953, I probably 
would not have been a teacher. I would probably have composed and just 
played. And I found out that every time there was a door that closed 
because of some accident, or because somebody who touched me, it opened 
another door that ultimately intended and finally worked out to be a 
door that I should have gone through. But George Russell saw that, and I
 was in his band and Quincy's band when the efforts, when the results of
 that accident started to manifest themselves. For instance, in '53, I'd
 found out after I started trying to play again that one side of my face
 had hypertrophied, while the other side atrophied, and I'd been playing
 on this imbalance, and constantly making adjustments. And ultimately, 
none of them worked, and another door opened for me, because without 
that, I probably would not have become a teacher and become a student of
 George Russell's across the years, and able to transmit some of that 
information he gave to me and so many other people.
    Jo Reed: Well, you turned to the cello, which is a little bit of an unusual choice for a jazz guy.
    David Baker: It is indeed, and sometimes I 
really go back and say, "Boy, how stupid was I to think at that age that
 I could start playing a cello?" It was a strange choice, but it was a 
choice that was pretty much governed by my exposure to it by my band 
teacher in high school. And he said, "David, these other instruments are
 not going to give you the challenge that playing a cello will." And I 
could have strangled him when I look back on it now and think, "Boy, 
that instrument defiesâ¦" I donât think a cello likes human beings, 
but I have had the good fortune to be around people like Janos Starker, 
who has been so instrumental in helping me with that instrument. And I 
think maybe just because it was an instrument that nobody else at that 
time of note was playing, it gave me a challenge, but it gave me a 
chance then to find the voice that would be distinctly my own voice, 
despite the fact that it was an instrument that is so difficult to play,
 that there were times, as I said before, I wanted to strangle Mr. 
Brown. Unfortunately, he died before I could get to it.
    Jo Reed: Is it fair to say with that switch to the cello, it also opened you up to focus more on composition? 
    David Baker: You're very prescient. You're 
absolutely right. That instrument lent itself to my spending a lot of 
time listening to the music of Shostakovich, of Kodaly, of Bela Bartok, 
and in the process, I began to understand that I was put on that 
instrument for a specific reason, and the reason was that that was the 
door that opened me to composition.
    Jo Reed: Well, let's talk about you as a composer. You have composed thousands of pieces
    David Baker: One thing is that my curiosity is 
such that I don't draw lines about anything other than the worth of the 
music: is it good or is it bad? So there never was for me this chasm 
that exists sometimes between classical and jazz music. So for me, with 
the cello now the instrument that I was playing, I started to look and 
really examine, and I had a chance to study then with Gunther Schuller 
and with John Lewis, as well as with JJ. So all of a sudden, my world 
exploded into all of these different things, and all of them closely 
related one to the other, and it's just a question of what you intended 
to do or what you chose to do with that information. For me, it was to 
write, to compose, to make music. And for a long time, I was very, very 
fruitful in what I was writing and stuff. And I hit a dry spot about ten
 years into that, and I thought, "Boy, I'm running out of ideas 
already." And then when I realized, I was starting to be more critical 
of what I was writing, so I was not nearly as fruitful, that I was 
turning out so many pieces. Now I think it's under control where I 
recognized that it has to be given great scrutiny if you're going to 
hope that the music would continue to grow.
    Jo Reed: Okay, here's a question from someone 
who's not a musician, but I just wonder, can you talk about the 
difference between playing the music and composing the music?
    David Baker: Yes, I can. Composing the music is 
different from the improvisation and playing the music, in that 
decisions are instant when you're playing. I mean, you don't have a 
chance to go back with an eraser. You don't have a chance to go back and
 try to say, "Well, maybe this would be better." Of course, we do, 
because we have the technology to do that. With jazz, every performance 
is absolutely different, even when you intend to play it the same way a 
second time or a third time. It's brand new. So I call composition 
frozen improvisation.
    Jo Reed: But I would imagine when you compose 
for jazz you would have to leave room for a certain amount of 
improvisation within the performance?
    David Baker: Yes. I think that 90 percent of the
 time that's probably true, even though Ellington and others would very 
often write out the entire piece. And, you know, to have the best of 
both worlds, where there are pieces that I write that I don't want 
anybody to improvise on because basically, I donât know that they 
would take the path that I intended the piece to go. But there are other
 pieces that I write in this third stream that Gunther named in 1958, I 
think, that I want them to have time to be able to play. And I have the 
best, you know, I know how blessed I am to have the best of both worlds.
    Jo Reed: Throughout your career, even when you 
were playing, you always kept a focus on education as well. And you went
 back to school as you were playing and got a masters degree and then 
worked on a doctorate. Why were you doing that? 
    David Baker: Well, I suppose part of it was just
 the fact that I was born with a huge curiosity about how the world 
works. And I think I wanted to know, you know, I tell people now that 
very often, it's hard for me to go to sleep. I need less sleep than most
 people, simply because I'm so afraid something will happen while I'm 
asleep, and I want to know all of the things. I know that none of us is 
omniscient. Only God is that but everything that there is to know I want
 to know. A new book comes out, I read the book. New techniques come 
out, even though I'm a dinosaur in terms of technology, it does not 
prevent me from being absolutely curious and also seeking out those 
people who can make available to me this wealth of information that is 
almost out of control, there is so much of it. When I stop and think, 
from the time I started to play to now, music has changed in such a way 
that it's unbelievable and it looks like every five years or so, it 
undergoes another metamorphosis.
    Jo Reed: But David, back in the day when you were working on your advanced degrees, it's not like there were jazz programs out there.
    David Baker: No, there were no jazz programs 
then, of course. Nature abhors a vacuum and so consequently, because we 
didn't have those books, we didn't have people teaching it, and people 
would come to me-- and I was very fortunate because I had a number of 
students who became famous like Freddie Hubbard, like the Brecker 
Brothers and whatever, I knew that there was a vacuum. And because there
 was a vacuum, it meant that I could write, I could teach, I could do 
these things, not only me, but Jerry Coker, Jamey Aebersold, and a host 
of others. I just happen to be one of those people in the right place at
 the right time.
    Jo Reed: What's important when you're putting together a curriculum for jazz?
    David Baker: Well, veracity is the first thing, 
to make sure that you've done homework, that you really have a sense of 
what's true and isn't true. It's almost like you have to go to the 
Griots in Africa, the older people, and you say, "Is this what happened 
for real?" And of course now, with the oral history projects that happen
 like at the Smithsonian, now we can go back and make sure. So I like to
 make sure first of all that I'm in possession of as much information as
 I can before I write about it. And it was just my good fortune to get 
there at a time when there were only a handful of books that dealt with 
how to transmit this information to other people. Now there are volumes 
that would probably fill a room if you just stacked them. But 
fortunately, they're now accessible, because of the iPod and all of 
these other things now that make it possible for a student to walk about
 with 2,000 tunes in their breast pocket.
Jo Reed: So, itâs safe to say youâve seen a lot of changes over the 40 years youâve been teaching. 
    David Baker: And you know to me, that's the 
thing that makes it so exciting and makes it so important, it isn't 
frozen. It's, like I said, a living organism. And what seems like 
immutable truth, five years later we find out that that really isn't it 
at all, or that it has changed so much that you don't even recognize 
what it was when it was at that other place. But as a teacher, the thing
 that is great for me, and I think other teachers, is that we are the 
repositories of that information, so that when I talk about Ellington 
and I teach a course on Ellington, I have to talk about the Ellington of
 1927, when he opened at the Cotton Club. And that's not anywhere near 
the Ellington of 1985 or 1945 or 1955. And to be constantly aware, and 
it takes me hours to prepare my classes. And people say, "When you've 
been teaching a class for 40 years, why do you spend two hours preparing
 it?" The facts don't change. What happens is our perception and how it 
affects other people, how it has been modified by new information, is so
 important, so that we don't get frozen and think that music stopped at a
 particular time. Even if we can say it was the classical period, it was
 the romantic period, even our perception of those things changed as we 
uncover new information.
    Jo Reed: Let me ask you, while we're talking about teaching is there a class that you always look forward to teaching?
    David Baker: Yes, basic improvisation because 
that, to me, is the root of everything else we do. If you don't have 
that, all the other things are pretty much doomed. I can't imagine, 
certainly for the layperson, there's a different level. But for jazz 
people who are serious, you really have to have improvisation as the 
basis for what you do. 
    Jo Reed: What excites you about your students 
now when they're playing. And I mean, just what excites you about the 
younger generation of jazz musicians?
    David Baker: Is their ability to access and 
process information. You know, the thing is, if I was starting now, I 
couldn't even get into Indiana University, or into any of the other jazz
 schools. Even though we were maybe the crème de la crème of our time,
 those things keep changing. And I think the beautiful thing about it is
 our ability to adjust and adapt to those changes without destroying 
where they came from. And to me, the most exciting thing is the fact, 
watching these kids, and I teach at a little place called Ravinia in the
 summertime with a camp I have right outside of Chicago. And the level 
of these kids now. I don't mean they have the wisdom and knowledge all 
the time, but they have physical skills, they have mental skills, that 
over the years have grown and grown and grown to the point where now 
they pick up an instrument and do things that Charlie Parker and 
Coltrane would have been amazed that somebody who's 17 or 18 years old, 
or, for that matter, a different gender, a woman, can do all of these 
things, and that's exciting for me. That's the reason why I keep 
teaching, because when I walk into that classroom and there are 60 
people who are hungry to know; it's the reason why, when I give a 
lecture, I tell them, "The most important part of my lecture is the 
questions that you ask me, because you make me have to re-examine my 
positions. Do I still think this way? Is that really the truth? Has it 
changed since I started?" And I find that so exciting, being around 
young people.
    Jo Reed: Okay, and finally, can you just recall 
how you found out you were made a Jazz Master? What that was like for 
you, what the whole event was like?
    David Baker: Yes. And it was so exciting, 
because I got the letter and the first thing is incredible. You say, "Oh
 me? Really?" And then I can remember, I think it was in 2000, Mary 
Mcpartland and Donald Byrd, and the three of us received the NEA award 
at that time. And I remember I was probably the youngest of the bunch. 
But to see the excitement in this cross-generational group, receiving 
this from the United States government with the big letter from the 
President and the whole thing. Nothing can adequately describe how 
exciting it is, not just for me, but I'm looking at these hardcore 
musicians, Herbie Hancock, a musician like the late Miles Davis, and 
they have that same excitement. You know, I don't know anything that we 
do that really equals that as far as how it affects our lives. And to 
me, when I go, I feel so proud of my country that in fact we have taken 
the time to invest money, resources, to make sure that the rest of the 
world knows how we feel about this music.
    Jo Reed: David Baker, thank you so much. I appreciate it.
    David Baker: Jo, thank you. 
    Jo Reed: And I'll see you at Jazz Masters.
    David Baker: I'll see you then. 
Jo Reed: That was NEA Jazz Master David Baker, talking about his career in music.Youâve been listening to Art Works, produced at the National Endowment for the Arts. The music is âTo Dizzy with Loveâ and âSome Links for Brother Tedâ
    Composed by David Baker, and performed by the Buselli/Wallarab Jazz Orchestra Theyâre from the CD titled, Basically Baker.   
The Arts Work podcast is posted every Thursday at 
www.arts.gov. Next week, the focus is opera. I speak with legendary 
composer, Carlisle Floyd. To find out how art works in communities 
across the country keep checking the Art Works blog, or follow us @NEArts on Twitter. For the National Endowment for the Arts, I'm Josephine Reed. Thanks for listening. 
Music up, hot.